Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />interests, A report on the first study, which was conducted by Western Engineers, <br />Inc, of Grand Junction, was published in 1983, PRC Engineering, Inc, of Denver <br />submits this report on the second study, <br /> <br />The titles, dates and description of reports and studies mentioned previously <br />follow: <br /> <br />A, Grand Mesa Project, Colorado, Concluding Report, prepared by the USBR, <br />Upper Colorado Region, Salt Lake City, September 1973. This document <br />offered a plan to store surplus water in a new reservoir to be located at <br />Electric Mountain in the Muddy Creek basin and to convey the water via a <br />new Grand Mesa canal to a proposed reservoir at Cactus Park, The latter <br />reservoir, according to the plan offered in the report, would also impound <br />water originating within the Tongue Creek basin. <br /> <br />B. Planning Report on the Grand Mesa Project, Colorado, prepared by the USBR, <br />Upper Colorado Region, May 1982, This document presented 22 alternative <br />plans for improved irrigation in the Tongue Creek basin, with and without <br />diversion of surplus water from other basins. One of the plans included <br />enlargement of the existing Fruitgrowers Reservoir. However, based on <br />estimated costs in 1981 prices and expected benefits, none of the alternative <br />plans were considered to be economically feasible. <br /> <br />C. Grand Mesa Project Feasibility Study, prepared by Western Engineers, Inc, of <br />Grand Junction for the CWCB and GMWCD, April 1983, This report <br />recommended a reservoir to be located at Cactus Park which would have <br />20,000 acre-feet of capacity for storage of water originating within the <br />Tongue Creek basin. Although primarily for irrigation, the proposed project <br />would include a small hydropower plant and improvements for recreation in <br />the headwaters area, Based on estimated costs of $15,6 million and expected <br />benefits from improved irrigation, generation of power, recreation and <br />municipal water supply, Western Engineers calculated that benefits would <br />exceed costs by a ratio of 1,9 to 1.0 and recommended further studies leading <br />to eventual design and construction of the project, <br /> <br />Section 5: Problems and Needs <br /> <br />Since the preliminary plan was offered by the USBR in a 1946 report entitled The <br />Colorado River, the basic theme in all of the studies for possible irrigation <br />improvements has been that agriculture in the Tongue Creek basin would be more <br />productive and more profitable if additional water was available, Problems and <br />needs of farmers, fruitgrowers and ranchers with respect to irrigation water were <br />examined in the present study. <br /> <br />1-5 <br />