Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Economic Analysis <br /> <br />If the project is not completed, providing a reliable irrigation water supply to the West Rhone <br />shareholders would be put at risk. Portions of the concrete ditch would continue to deteriorate. <br />Even if the ditch was replaced with pipe along the existing alignment up to the divider box, <br />problems with the divider box and misuse of the doubler slide gate would continue to put the <br />shareholders at risk of losing up to 50 percent of the water supply they have rights to <br />(discussed eariier and shown in Appendix C). <br /> <br />As a result, annual production of lands in the 105-acre service area could be reduced. The <br />average net yield per acre with water is estimated at $60, compared to a net yield of $25 as <br />dry or marginally irrigated land. This results in an annual loss of $35/acre x 105 acres = <br />$3,675. A major benefit of the project is avoiding the annual economic loss associated with an <br />unreliable supply of irrigation water within the service area. <br /> <br />Social and Physical Impacts <br /> <br />The project would have no significant social impacts, since it would assure the continued <br />operation of an existing irrigation system. All of the lands served by the West Rhone lateral lie <br />within the Mesa County Buffer Zone, except for one 1.96-acre parcel. Lands within the Buffer <br />Zone are subject to restrictions on minimum acreage and development density. Most of the <br />lands served by Lateral 395 lie east of 21 Road, which is outside of the Buffer Zone, and <br />future development of these lands is expected to occur at a higher density. Providing a <br />separate headgate and irrigation water delivery system for the West Rhone lands within this <br />Buffer Zone will help preserve the desirable agricultural characteristics of this area, as was <br />intended by Mesa County when the Buffer Zone was established. This would be a positive <br />social impact of the project. <br /> <br />The project would have minor physical impacts during construction, and minimal impacts once <br />construction is complete and the pipeline is buried. <br /> <br />Conclusions and Project Commitments <br /> <br />The West Rhone Lateral Ditch Company is an incorporated entity in the State of Colorado with <br />the ability to enter into contracts with the NRCS and the CWCB for the purpose of obtaining a <br />cost-share grant and a construction fund loan. <br /> <br />There are no known right-of-way or easement concems for the construction of this project. <br /> <br />The project would provide for the continued delivery of irrigation water to the West Rhone <br />share holders. <br /> <br />The project would have no effect on the delivery of irrigation water to the GVIC shareholders <br />who receive water via Laterals 395 and 396. There are no delivery turnouts upstream of the <br />divider box where the West Rhone diverts its water. If the 130 shares of the West Rhone are <br />removed from the upstream segment of Lateral 395, a corresponding volume of water would <br /> <br />West Rhone Lateral Ditch Company <br /> <br />Headgate and Pipeline Feasibility Study <br />August 2000 <br /> <br />7 <br />