Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 3-2 <br /> <br />NORTH FORK TO JUNIATA DIVERSION FACILITIES <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES RANKING <br /> <br />Ranki nq <br /> <br />Project Cos t <br /> <br />o & M <br /> <br />Flexibil ity <br /> <br />Transmission <br />Losses Environ/Political <br /> <br />5 B-1 (50) A (25) A (15) A (25) A (25) <br />4 A (40) B-2 (20) 8-1,2,3,4 (12) 8-4 (20) 8-2 (20) <br />3 B-3 (30) 8-4 (15) 8-3 (15) B-4 (15) <br />2 B-2 (20) B-3 (10) B-2 (10) B-3 (10) <br />1 8-4 (10) 8-1 (5) B-1 (5) 8-1 (5) <br /> POINTS SUMMARY <br /> <br /> AL TERNATIVE TOTAL POINTS <br /> A 130 <br /> 8-1 77 <br /> B-2 82 <br /> B-3 77 <br /> 8-4 72 <br />On the basis of the above findings, we recommend Alter nat i ve A as the <br /> <br />preferred method of diversion of North Fork water to Juniata Reservoir. <br /> <br />3-12 <br />