My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00020
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 12:54:54 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153567
Contractor Name
Grand Junction, City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
SB 89-85
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Flexibility. Optional full flow delivery to Purdy Mesa Reservoir is inherent <br />in the Alternate A design. Alternative B Purdy Mesa Reservoir option is <br />limited to 6 cfs (capacity of existing City Pipeline). At an additional cost, <br />a turnout structure could be included to divert from the lower drainageway to <br />the Lander Extension Ditch to get full flow delivery capability. There are no <br />distinctions between the Alternative B options with respect to flexibility. <br /> <br />Transmission Losses. Closely related to 0 & M, this factor also favors <br />Alternate A, primarily on the basis of transmission losses and maintainability <br />of diversion structures. <br /> <br />Environmental & Pol itical Considerations. Because of alterations to fish and <br />wildl ife habitat on publ ic as well as private lands, Alternate B options are <br />quite environmentally sensitive. This could lead to substantial delays and <br />expenditures with respect to the permitting process for both the Forest Service <br />and BLM. Depending on public reaction to press releases by the Federal <br />agencies announcing proposed modifications, the appropriate response would have <br />to be presented in an environmental assessment. The erosion potential of <br />Alternate B-1 would be particularly difficult to justify. <br /> <br />3-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.