Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />causing undue hardship and significant expense to obtain the court <br />augmentation decree. Assuming that acceptable terms and conditions could be <br />obtained in a court approved augmentation decree, this would be the most <br />desirable outcome as it would provide certainty as to how the well could be <br />pumped in the future. <br />The cost for engineering and legal services to obtain a separate court <br />approved augmentation plan could easily exceed $25,000 and because of <br />uncertainties as to what terms and conditions might be required, this does not <br />appear to be a feasible alternative for CRPOA to pursue at this time. <br />Purchase Water from Another Source for the Centralized Svstem - If <br />CRPOA was to discontinue the use of its own well and purchase water for <br />delivery to the centralized system from another source then irrigation, watering <br />of livestock, and fire protection could continue. At this time South Adams Water <br />and Sanitation District is extending their water lines into the area. Larry Ford, <br />Manager of the District, was contacted and he reported that their District would <br />sell water to CRPOA but it would be much too expensive for irrigation or <br />livestock watering. Their current charge is $2.00 per thousand gallons <br />($650/acre-foot) and because of their recent contract with Denver they expect a <br />significant rate increase. Assuming that CRPOA would need a minimum of 120 <br />acre-feet of water per year, this woulcj represent a cost of at least $78,000 per <br />year, or a per lot cost of $1445 per year. This alternative would be significantly <br />more expensive and would be subject to rate hike increases, and the South <br />Adams District might refuse delivery of water for irrigation if they have <br />insufficient supply. <br />Pumpinq of Non-tributarv Wells - For CRPOA to meet a 500gpm demand <br />they would have to have several (three to five) deep bedrock wells. The Lower <br />Arapahoe and Laramie Foxhills Aquifers are non-tributary beneath the <br />Subdivision, but the annual yield from both formations which is limited by the <br />land area in the Subdivision would not yield the needed 120 acre-feet per year. <br />The cost for a Lower Arapahoe well ranging from 700 to 900 feet deep could be <br />as high as $100,000. Data from recently drilled wells into that formation shows <br />the formation to be a poor producer with maximum yields less than 25gpm and <br />