My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC05061
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
ISFAPPC05061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2017 2:46:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:24:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
03CW0276
Stream Name
Big Beaver Creek
Watershed
White River
Water Division
5
Water District
43
County
Rio Blanco
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The BLM has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported for this reach of stream in the BLM letter <br />to the CWCB "Fishery surveys indicate that the stream environment is in stable condition, and <br />supports a self-sustaining Colorado River Cutthroat Trout and mottled sculpin fishery. <br />Spawning substrate, cover, and food availability are good for salmonids. However, pools are <br />limited in this reach, underscoring the importance of protecting flows to maintain adequate depth <br />and physical habitat where pools are not available" (See Fish Surveys in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />BLM <br /> <br />Date <br />09/18/1998 <br /> <br />Q <br />2.51 <br /> <br />250%-40% <br />6.3 - 1.0 <br /> <br />Summer (3/3) <br />16.4l1) <br /> <br />Winter (2/3) <br />2.9 <br /> <br />BLM - Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(I) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table, <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria but is outside the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model is 16.4 cfs (See Table 1). The winter flow recommendation, which <br />meets 2 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model is 2.9 cfs (See <br />Table 1). <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.