My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EF Dry Creek Appendices
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
EF Dry Creek Appendices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 10:45:30 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:16:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
05CW0151
Stream Name
East Fork Dry Creek
Watershed
Uncompahgre
Water Division
4
Water District
41
County
Montrose
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table I' Data <br /> <br />PartY Date Q 250%-40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />BLM 06/03/2003 1.57 0.6 - 3.9 3.64 1.58 <br />BLM 10/14/2003 0.30 0.1-0.7 8.76(1) 0.82(1) <br />BLM 11103/2004 1.39 0.6 - 3.5 ? 0.50(1) <br /> <br />BLM "" Bureau of Land Management DOW = DIVISion ofWildhfe <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model is 3.6 cfs (See Table I). The winter flow recommendation, which meets <br />2 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model is 1.6 cfs (See Table I). <br />It is our belief that recommendations that fall outside of the accuracy range of the model, over <br />250% of the measured discharge or under 40% of the measured discharge, may not give an <br />accurate estimate of the necessary instream flow required. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB and BLM staff, <br />conducted an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available <br />for an instream flow appropriation. Although there is a substantial amount of streamflow gage <br />data available for the Uncompahgre Plateau and Glade Park, most of this data is severely <br />impacted by diversions and irrigation use. This situation makes it difficult to estimate the natural <br />flow regime for the watersheds on the Plateau. Without specific gage data to evaluate, the next <br />best approach is a regional equation that estimates annual flow characteristics. The USGS has <br />developed regional equations (Estimation of Natural Streamflow Characteristics in Western <br />Colorado. Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4086. 1985) that apply to the Uncompahgre <br />Plateau and Glade Park based on basin drainage area, mean annual precipitation, mean basin <br />elevation and mean basin slope. The report "Uncompahgre Plateau and Glade Park Annual <br />Hydrograph Estimation" in Appendix C, explains staff's water availability analysis in more <br />detail. Table 2 below displays the estimated stream flow of East Fork Dry Creek. <br /> <br />For this reach, the synthetic hydrograph shows that the summer flow recommendation of 3.4 cfs <br />is available only from April I to June 30. The summer flow recommendation was reduced to <br />1.60 cfs for the time period of July I through July 31 based on limited water availability. The <br />winter flow recommendation of 1.6 cfs is only available March I through March 3 I. The winter <br />flow recommendation was reduced to 0.6 efs for the period of August I to February 28 based on <br />limited water availability. <br /> <br />Table 2: Estimated Stream Flow on West Fork Dry Creek: <br />Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun <br />(cts) 0.7 1.4 2.0 31.0 113.0 51.9 <br /> <br />Jul <br />2.7 <br /> <br />Aug Sep <br />1.0 0.8 <br /> <br />Oct <br />0.8 <br /> <br />Nov Dee <br />0.8 0.7 <br /> <br />- 4- <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.