My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC03908
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
ISFAPPC03908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 1:31:00 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:11:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
03CW0268
Stream Name
Horse Creek
Watershed
Horse Creek
Water Division
5
Water District
53
County
Eagle
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />supports a self-sustaining brook trout fishery. Channel and bank stability, substrate, and water <br />quality are excellent for salmonids. However, the low number of pools and sub-optimal cover <br />are limiting factors for fish habitat, underscoring the importance of adequate flows to prevent <br />further stress to the fish population" (see CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />BLM <br />BLM <br /> <br />Date <br />4/21/1998 <br />06/11/2002 <br /> <br />Q <br />0.86 <br />0.6 <br /> <br />250%-40% <br />2.2 - 0.3 <br />1.5-0.2 <br /> <br />Summer (3/3) <br />1.0 <br />0.9 <br /> <br />Winter (2/3) <br />0.7 <br />0.8 <br /> <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendations, which meet 3 of 3 criteria and are within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model range from 1.0 - 0.9 cfs (See Table 1). Averaging the two summer flow <br />recommendations within range results in a 0.95 cfs recommendation. The winter flow <br />recommendations, which meet 2 of 3 criteria and are inside the accuracy range of the R2CROSS <br />model range from 0.8 - 0.7 cfs (See Table 1 ). Averaging the two winter flow recommendations <br />within range results in a 0.75 cfs recommendation. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.