<br />1954 90% 72%
<br />1955 88% 71%
<br />1956 73% 53%
<br />1957 m'Lb'blb"'II"'I"'''lml'''I'~189%L'bi'''''''i'I'lii,,'lm,''~/0;,1":'" ,<'E'lill..
<br /> <+<1;1'" i":;:" L. ,,:;>1,". -,;1");:<1' ."-"", ;p-,',
<br />1958 75%' ~'Ii'i"'i[t,
<br /> o -,1"" !J,'EI!!,'- -
<br />1959 . . '11."'1'1'00/. "II.' ",,' '" ".' '40/.'11.' ' ,
<br />,. -, ,', --., ''-- ,k".,' 0 '; 'j"" k ," '" 0
<br />1960 82% 85%
<br />1961 , , 1120% .1,11 ,'.1""1 I" It42%
<br /> ,
<br />1962 61% 76%
<br />1963 64% 95%
<br />1964 ,', " 1'020/. 'I,,', 99%
<br /> .< L _,:_,,:,,_~ . . "
<br />1965 '1 , 1~8% , 0%
<br />1966 77% 68%
<br />1967 ' 1137% " . 11'2%
<br /> . .
<br />1968 84% 98%
<br />1969 172% 1S7%
<br />1970 67% 76%
<br />1971 97% 87%
<br />1972 94% 96%
<br />1973 ,',,",'.- ""'<'1'000/.'''''''., "",,', 65%
<br /> I' , '__"._ 0 ,
<br />1974 No Data 88%
<br />1975 91% 98%
<br />1976 'Ii "''''';j'220/.'' ' hi- 80%
<br /> -,,', _.,,' 1- 0'
<br />1977 78% 81%
<br />1978 , 1'1"10/. " 99%
<br /> 'A" 0
<br />1979 86% 88%
<br />1980 89% 93%
<br />1981 , ,,1"1[11,1, 'r. ",,--c- 100%
<br />1Qli~o . "
<br />1982 No Data 89%
<br />1983 82% "" . ,103o/~ ' . .
<br />1984 87% 78%
<br />1985 91% . 127%, ' .', . I'
<br />1986 95% . '~29%
<br />1987 78% 85%
<br />1988 85% 84%
<br />1989 85% 88%
<br />1990 " 'd'1'45%. '. '.. . ".1', ,,, .1158%", ",.,,'
<br />1991 96% ',,[I[ '''[1[33%' ',.' " .
<br /> '11.,
<br />1992 ," "I,' 100%. ,I,.' ,b".. 1'34%'
<br /> ,. :iii"::,, 0' ',.'-_<,_ ,
<br />1993 87% " I,>': "",126%, "","."
<br />1994 'c, .. ,'1[19% ' '<II. No Data
<br />1995 No Data .', , 103%
<br />1996 No Data 71%
<br />1997 , ""J33% ".. ,," . 100.%
<br />
<br />Table 3 shows a slight variation of precipitation between the two relatively close precipitation
<br />sites. It is staffs opinion that the 83 years of stream-flow data analyzed is representative of
<br />average water-years.
<br />
<br />- 6 -
<br />
|