Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1954 90% 72% <br />1955 88% 71% <br />1956 73% 53% <br />1957 m'Lb'blb"'II"'I"'''lml'''I'~189%L'bi'''''''i'I'lii,,'lm,''~/0;,1":'" ,<'E'lill.. <br /> <+<1;1'" i":;:" L. ,,:;>1,". -,;1");:<1' ."-"", ;p-,', <br />1958 75%' ~'Ii'i"'i[t, <br /> o -,1"" !J,'EI!!,'- - <br />1959 . . '11."'1'1'00/. "II.' ",,' '" ".' '40/.'11.' ' , <br />,. -, ,', --., ''-- ,k".,' 0 '; 'j"" k ," '" 0 <br />1960 82% 85% <br />1961 , , 1120% .1,11 ,'.1""1 I" It42% <br /> , <br />1962 61% 76% <br />1963 64% 95% <br />1964 ,', " 1'020/. 'I,,', 99% <br /> .< L _,:_,,:,,_~ . . " <br />1965 '1 , 1~8% , 0% <br />1966 77% 68% <br />1967 ' 1137% " . 11'2% <br /> . . <br />1968 84% 98% <br />1969 172% 1S7% <br />1970 67% 76% <br />1971 97% 87% <br />1972 94% 96% <br />1973 ,',,",'.- ""'<'1'000/.'''''''., "",,', 65% <br /> I' , '__"._ 0 , <br />1974 No Data 88% <br />1975 91% 98% <br />1976 'Ii "''''';j'220/.'' ' hi- 80% <br /> -,,', _.,,' 1- 0' <br />1977 78% 81% <br />1978 , 1'1"10/. " 99% <br /> 'A" 0 <br />1979 86% 88% <br />1980 89% 93% <br />1981 , ,,1"1[11,1, 'r. ",,--c- 100% <br />1Qli~o . " <br />1982 No Data 89% <br />1983 82% "" . ,103o/~ ' . . <br />1984 87% 78% <br />1985 91% . 127%, ' .', . I' <br />1986 95% . '~29% <br />1987 78% 85% <br />1988 85% 84% <br />1989 85% 88% <br />1990 " 'd'1'45%. '. '.. . ".1', ,,, .1158%", ",.,,' <br />1991 96% ',,[I[ '''[1[33%' ',.' " . <br /> '11., <br />1992 ," "I,' 100%. ,I,.' ,b".. 1'34%' <br /> ,. :iii"::,, 0' ',.'-_<,_ , <br />1993 87% " I,>': "",126%, "","." <br />1994 'c, .. ,'1[19% ' '<II. No Data <br />1995 No Data .', , 103% <br />1996 No Data 71% <br />1997 , ""J33% ".. ,," . 100.% <br /> <br />Table 3 shows a slight variation of precipitation between the two relatively close precipitation <br />sites. It is staffs opinion that the 83 years of stream-flow data analyzed is representative of <br />average water-years. <br /> <br />- 6 - <br />