Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />CEHTr.,;l FIlESRECEl\'t'J ,,,,, ., '"'' "m "," <br /> <br />DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVIS~Np4 'i6COLO~6 ~PR II P;2: ZS <br />Case No. 80CW67 DIY Of WATEf\ REIOUfICII lot OIH.WAlil., COUAT <br />STATE !NOIN.... \VELO COUNTy COLQ. <br />----------------------------OOl~DCr--------------------------- <br />.' <br /> <br />FI~ro!NGS or FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, RULING OF THE WATER <br />REFEREE, AND DECREE OF THE WATER JUDGE <br /> <br />,,',.....h ':; <br /> <br />--------------------------------------------------------..-------- <br /> <br />IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF COLORADO <br />WATER CONSERVAT!O;, BOARD, IN THE MIDDLE FORK OF THE SOUTH <br />PLATTE RIVER, IN THE COUNTY OF PARK <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />:? <br />This matter having come on for hearing upon the application <br />of the Colorado Water Conservation Board for direct flow water <br />rights pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 37-92-102(3) and 37-92-103(3), <br />(4), and (10), which war" filed on March 10, 1980, and the referee <br />being fully advised in the premises, does hereby find: <br /> <br />Timely and adeq~ate notice of the application and the pro- <br />ceedings in this matt~~~have been given as required by law, and <br />the referee has juris~ic~~bn over th~ subject matter of this ap- <br />plication, over all of~the parties who have appeared, and over <br />those who have not appeared but could have appeared. <br /> <br />Statements of opposition to said application were filed by <br />the City of Thornton and the Town of Fairplay. A status confer- <br />ence was held before the referee on September 13, 1982. Counsel <br />for objector City of Thornton did not appear. The attorney gen- <br />eral was instructed to prepare a proposed ruling upon reaching an <br />agreement with the Town of Fairplay. <br /> <br />Statements of opposition were also filed by Willows ~ater <br />District and Rialto, Inc.' A stipulation was reached with tt~ <br />district and i~s statement of opposition was withdrawn. That <br />stipulation is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. Rialto <br />also withdrew its opposition prior to the 1982 status conference, <br />which withdrawal is similarly incorporated herein. <br /> <br />All matters contained in toe applicatio~ having b~en re- <br />viewed, and testimony having been taken where such testimony is <br />necessary, and such corrections made as are indicated by the evi- <br />dence presented herein, the court finds that the statements con- <br />tained in the application are tru~ and that applicant is entitled <br />to the water right requested in the application. <br /> <br />IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED ~ DECREED: <br /> <br />.=""l'!-'I'-r>!'" <br />h__~ ":_'..j).:..f'> ~";rl..t~. '_',)""" <br /> <br />--:':' ;.,'-., .~~ '""", <br /> <br />-:"~:1::,'- .,.' ;,. '( ~,il.~(' ,,,~ . ," < '" <br /> <br />, ~:<:' , ,j-Y, " ,',:-,;', :"", <br /> <br />