My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPP00213
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPP00213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2016 12:03:52 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 10:18:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
92CW0080
Stream Name
East Fork Williams Fork River
Watershed
Williams Fork River
Water Division
6
Water District
44
County
Rio Blanco
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Final Decree/Stipulations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ing of statements of Opposition in Water Court <br />{~37-92-302 (1) (b), C.R.S. (1990 Repl. VoL)} do not ap- <br />ply to the Objectors' rights to sell their lands and/or <br />water rights unless the Sale involves a change of water <br />rights Application filed with the Water Court. <br /> <br />To resolve the Objectors' concerns with'the Application <br />filed in this case, the parties have agreed that in the event the <br />CWCB acquires water rights which are senior in priority to the <br />water rights owned by the Objectors at that time and which are <br />located in the in stream flow r~ached described in the Application <br />filed in this case, the CWCB w~uld be required under the current <br />statutes to file an application to change the use of the acquired <br />water rights with the Water CO~rt_ Once a change of use Applica- <br />tion is filed with the Water C0urt, the current provisions of <br />~37-92-302(1) (b) would allow the Objectors to file statements <br />of opposition to any proposed ~hange which the Objectors believe <br />may injure their water rights. <br /> <br />The Referee has made such investigations as are necessary <br />to determine whether or not the statements in the Application are <br />true and has become fully advi~ed with respect to the subject <br />matter of the Application. The Referee has spoken to the remain- <br />ing Objector, Ted Myers, concerning Mr. Myers' objection to this <br />Application. The Referee has requested that Mr. Myers submit his <br />concerns that members of the PUblic not gain a right to trespass <br />on his property to gain access to the instream flow in writing to <br />the Referee. Mr. Myers has failed to comply with the Referee's <br />request. <br /> <br />IT IS HEREBY THE RULING OF THE WATER REFEREE: <br /> <br />1. The name and address of the Applicant are: <br /> <br />Colorado water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, suite 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />(303) 866-3441 <br /> <br />2. The name of the natural stream is: <br /> <br />The East Fork Williams Fork River (instream flow). <br /> <br />3. The legal description of the stream segment through <br />which the instream flow is claimed is: <br /> <br />The natural stream channel from the confluence of <br />Poose Creek in the vicinity of latitude <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.