My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10248
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:33 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 5:01:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Naitonwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Introduction to Flood Proofing; An Outline of Principles and Methods
Date
4/1/1967
Prepared By
The University of Chicago Center for Urban Studies
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />use, flood proofing would allow development in these hazardous areas. Because of the <br />adjustments made, however, the potential flood damages are reduced and the pressures <br />for a public floed control project are likewise reduced. From this vantage point, flood <br />proofing techniques are important, not only to individual property owners, but to public <br />officials interested in proper flood plain management. <br />A flood control approach now being considered is to clear the flood plain through a <br />system of tax rebates which reduce a property value to zero over a 10 or 20 year period. <br />In such an approach, flood proofing could furnish protection to a building during the amor- <br />tization period prior to its demolition. <br /> <br />Flood Proofing and Flood Insurance <br />Flood proofing and flood insurance are interrelated and can be considered together <br />in a comprehensive program for flood damage reduction. Effective noro proofing could <br />be used to reduce flood risks to a level where it would be possible for private insurance <br />firms to underwrite flood insurance at a marketable rate. This is the situation in the <br />Golden Triangle of Pittsburgh, where flood insurance on a private commercial basis is <br />available to the J. P. Horne Company because of their flood proofing program. <br />Flood proofing is used to protect against the losses that would otherwise occur from <br />the more frequent flood events, while flood insurance is used to protect against losses <br />from the less frequent event--the large magnitude flood which occurs so infrequently and <br />has such a high stage that it is not economically feasible to flood proof against it. <br />If flood insurance becomes more widely available, the effect should be to stimulate <br />flood proofing, since the insuring companies would encourage protection of the insured <br />properties and would reward such protection with reduced flood insurance rates. In a <br />federally sponsored flood insurance program, for example, the premium schedule would <br />probably reflect degrees of flood risk. A flood proofed building able to withstand a flood <br />stage that was considered a low risk would most certainly obtain a more desirable pre- <br />mium rate. The potential dollar savings in premiums could serve to encourage property <br />owners to use flood proofing measures. <br /> <br />Flood Proofing Decisions <br />The protection of property from flood losses depends, in part, upon the owner's <br />awareness of the flood hazard and a willingness to do something about it. To arrive at <br />feasible decisions pertaining to flood proofing, the <br />property owner must recognize potential flood prob- <br />lems and their related effects. This knowledge can <br />be obtained in several ways. <br />The worst way, of course, is personal experi- <br />l' ence~-to have seen one's own building damaged and <br />its contents ruined (Figure 1) and to have suffered <br />the labor and cost of cleaning up (Figure 2). There <br />are other ways, however. <br />A building owner may become aware of a flocxl <br />hazard from a "near miss" when a flood almost <br />caused a catastrophe. U flooding occurred before <br />the present owner located on the site, he may have <br />been informed by others that the property he now oc- <br />cupies had been severely damaged in the past. <br />The owner may have been unaware of his flood <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Figure 1. - Learning of the flood <br />hazard through experience. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.