Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of conveyance and storage methods and system types. When a multipurpose <br />strategy is adopted in a broad sense, it involves participation by both <br />public and private interests. This, in turn, creates a need for overall <br />supervision and a master plan for drainage. <br /> <br />AN URBAN DRAINAGE STRATEGY SHOULD BE A MULTIPURPOSE, MULTIPLE MEANS <br />EFFORT. <br /> <br />1. 2.6 Bas in Transfer <br /> <br />Colorado drainage law recognizes the inequitability of transferring the <br />burden on managing storm drainage from one location or property to <br />another. Liability questions also arise when the historic drainage <br />continuum is altered. The diversion of storm runoff from one basin to <br />another should be avoided unless specific and prudent reasons justify and <br />dictate such a transfer. Prior to selecting a solution, alternatives <br />should be reviewed. Planning and design of storm water drainage systems <br />should not be based on the premise that problems can be transferred from <br />one location to another. <br /> <br />The subdivision process can and will significantly alter the historic or <br />natural drainage paths. When these alterations result in a subdivision <br />outfall system that discharges back into the natural drainageway at or <br />near the historic location, then the alterations (intra-basin transfer) <br />are generally acceptable. However, when the subdivision outfall system <br />does not return to the historic drainageway, then inter-basin transfer may <br />result. This inter-basin transfer must be prevented since it violates a <br />basic civil drainage law principle by discharging water onto a subservient <br />property in a manner or quantity to do more harm than formerly. If the <br />development significantly increases the drainage area tributary to the <br />subdivision outfall, then inter-basin transfer into the property has <br />occurred, which also must be prevented. <br /> <br />THE POL! CY OF lliE CITY/COUNTY SHALL BE TO AVO I D INTER-BAS IN TRANSFER OF <br />STORM DRAINAGE RUNOFF AND TO .fli#j~"'''''S.'.K-''Dft.U,ml!.I!:1IlI\TH WITHIN <br />THE BASIN. HOWEVER, THE TRANSFER OF DRAINAGE FROM BASIN TO BASIN IS A <br />VIABLE ALTERNATIVE IN CERTAIN INSTANCES AND WILL BE REVIEWED ON A CASE-BY- <br />CASE BASIS. IN ALL CASES A SUITABLE OUTFALL SHALL BE PROVIDED. <br /> <br />1.3 Financial Responsibility <br /> <br />A developer is generally required to pay for the drainage facilities serving <br />new subdivisions or major urban development projects such as for shopping malls <br />or business office complexes. <br /> <br />The City/County have established a drainage board to administer a Subdivision <br />Storm Drainage Fund. The Storm Drainage Fund in part pays for drainage <br />improvements based on collection of a unit drainage fee from developers (see <br />Chapter 3). <br /> <br />1-8 <br />