|
<br />
<br />NITROGEN AND
<br />PHOSPHORUS IN
<br />SURFACE WATERS
<br />
<br />Eutrophication of freshwater streams
<br />generally results from an excessive
<br />amount of phosphorus in the system,
<br />whereas excessive nitrogen is most often
<br />the cause of eutrophication in estuaries.
<br />In order to prevent nuisance plant growth
<br />in streams, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
<br />tion Agency (USEPA) has established a
<br />desired goal of 0.1 mg/L of total phospho-
<br />rus concentrations in freshwaters not
<br />flowing directly into reservoirs or lakes
<br />(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
<br />1986a), but currently there is no national
<br />recommendation for total nitrogen concen-
<br />trations in either freshwater or coastal
<br />systems. The USEPA is leading efforts to
<br />develop regional criteria for both phospho-
<br />rus and nitrogen in surface waters across
<br />the Nation.
<br />Nitrate is generally the primary form of
<br />nitrogen dissolved in water. Ammonia is
<br />commonly associated with point sources
<br />and is converted to nitrate or nitrogen gas
<br />in aerated water. Organic nitrogen, mostly
<br />from plant material, can compose a large
<br />part of the total (dissolved and particulate)
<br />nitrogen concentration in a stream. Total
<br />phosphorus in streams consists of phos-
<br />phates that do not dissolve readily, but are
<br />commonly attached to soil particles, and
<br />orthophosphates, which are readily dis-
<br />solved and easily assimilated by aquatic
<br />plants,
<br />In general, nitrogen and phosphorus
<br />concentrations are most elevated in small
<br />streams that drain basins with large pro-
<br />portions of urban or agricultural land use
<br />(U.S. Geological Survey, 1999). Point-
<br />_. source discharges are a major source of
<br />"nitrate to the Tar and Neuse Rivers, but
<br />ground water is an important source of
<br />phosphorus to many streams in eastern
<br />North Carolina (Spruill and others, 1998).
<br />Nutrient concentrations in streams that
<br />drain to the Albemarle and Pamlico
<br />Sounds were high relative to 19 other large
<br />. drainage basins studied by the USGS dur-
<br />ing 1992-95 (Spruill and others, 1998).
<br />
<br />concentrations at Fort Barnwell may have been the result of
<br />greater inundation of land areas downstream from Kinston,
<br />resulting in higher organic nitrogen loadings. Previous measure-
<br />ments of organic nitrogen made at Fort Barnwell during
<br />less-than-nonnal flows in April and July 1999 were lower-
<br />measuring 0.45 and 0,37 mg/L, respectively; however, nitrate
<br />concentrations in April and July were an order of magnitude
<br />higher.
<br />Ammonia concentrations in the Cape Fear River (site 40),
<br />Northeast Cape Fear River (site 43), and Lumber River (site 45)
<br />ranged from 0.025 mg/L at site 45 to 0.246 mg/L at site 43, The
<br />highest ammonia concentration (0.246 mg/L) measured among
<br />all of the flood samples (table 6) was in the Northeast Cape Fear
<br />River and occurred 6 days following the flood peak. Nitrate con-
<br />centrations at these three southeast North Carolina sites ranged
<br />from 0.015 mg/L at site 45 to 0.330 mg/L at site 40. Median
<br />organic nitrogen concentrations at sites 40, 43, and 45 were sim-
<br />ilar to median flood-sample concentrations measured in the Tar
<br />and Neuse Rivers-about 0.7 mg/L-although the maximum
<br />concentration in the Northeast Cape Fear River was 1.1 mg/L.
<br />Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations ranged from
<br />8.4 to 16 mg/L as carbon (C) in the Tar, Neuse, and Cape Fear
<br />Rivers, and 17 to 25 mg/L in the carbon-rich, coastal Northeast
<br />Cape Fear and Lumber Rivers. These DOC concentrations in
<br />floodwaters generally exceeded the highest DOC concentrations
<br />previously measured by the USGS in the Tar and Neuse Rivers
<br />during the 1990's (table 8).
<br />Floodwaters had two primary effects on nitrogen, phosphorus,
<br />and organic carbon. First, floodwaters resulted in tremendous
<br />dilution ofthese constituents. For example, the maximum ammo-
<br />nia concentration at Tarboro (site 14) was 0,051 mglL on
<br />September 21 when the flow was 61,000 fi3/s. If the same mass
<br />of ammonia was present at the long-tenn September mean flow
<br />of 1,220 fi3/s, then the ammonia concentration would have been
<br />2.55 mg/L, or a concentration about 10 times greater than was
<br />measured during 1990-99 at the site (table 8). Despite this dilu-
<br />tion, maximum concentrations of ammonia, organic nitrogen,
<br />total phosphorus, and orthophosphorus were similar to 1990-99
<br />median concentrations, Only nitrate levels were low compared to
<br />1990-99 concentrations. The second effect of floodwaters was to
<br />export large amounts of organic matter from the floodplains to the
<br />streams, as indicated by the high organic nitrogen, DOC, and
<br />suspended organic carbon concentrations. The long-term effects
<br />of these large loads of organic matter on coastal waters remains
<br />to be seen.
<br />
<br />Bacteria
<br />
<br />Floodwaters from Hurricane Floyd inundated animal waste
<br />lagoons in eastern North Carolina, killed tens of thousands of
<br />
<br />Two Months of Flooding in Eastern North Carolina, Septcmber--Octobcr 1999
<br />
|