Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />NITROGEN AND <br />PHOSPHORUS IN <br />SURFACE WATERS <br /> <br />Eutrophication of freshwater streams <br />generally results from an excessive <br />amount of phosphorus in the system, <br />whereas excessive nitrogen is most often <br />the cause of eutrophication in estuaries. <br />In order to prevent nuisance plant growth <br />in streams, the U.S. Environmental Protec- <br />tion Agency (USEPA) has established a <br />desired goal of 0.1 mg/L of total phospho- <br />rus concentrations in freshwaters not <br />flowing directly into reservoirs or lakes <br />(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <br />1986a), but currently there is no national <br />recommendation for total nitrogen concen- <br />trations in either freshwater or coastal <br />systems. The USEPA is leading efforts to <br />develop regional criteria for both phospho- <br />rus and nitrogen in surface waters across <br />the Nation. <br />Nitrate is generally the primary form of <br />nitrogen dissolved in water. Ammonia is <br />commonly associated with point sources <br />and is converted to nitrate or nitrogen gas <br />in aerated water. Organic nitrogen, mostly <br />from plant material, can compose a large <br />part of the total (dissolved and particulate) <br />nitrogen concentration in a stream. Total <br />phosphorus in streams consists of phos- <br />phates that do not dissolve readily, but are <br />commonly attached to soil particles, and <br />orthophosphates, which are readily dis- <br />solved and easily assimilated by aquatic <br />plants, <br />In general, nitrogen and phosphorus <br />concentrations are most elevated in small <br />streams that drain basins with large pro- <br />portions of urban or agricultural land use <br />(U.S. Geological Survey, 1999). Point- <br />_. source discharges are a major source of <br />"nitrate to the Tar and Neuse Rivers, but <br />ground water is an important source of <br />phosphorus to many streams in eastern <br />North Carolina (Spruill and others, 1998). <br />Nutrient concentrations in streams that <br />drain to the Albemarle and Pamlico <br />Sounds were high relative to 19 other large <br />. drainage basins studied by the USGS dur- <br />ing 1992-95 (Spruill and others, 1998). <br /> <br />concentrations at Fort Barnwell may have been the result of <br />greater inundation of land areas downstream from Kinston, <br />resulting in higher organic nitrogen loadings. Previous measure- <br />ments of organic nitrogen made at Fort Barnwell during <br />less-than-nonnal flows in April and July 1999 were lower- <br />measuring 0.45 and 0,37 mg/L, respectively; however, nitrate <br />concentrations in April and July were an order of magnitude <br />higher. <br />Ammonia concentrations in the Cape Fear River (site 40), <br />Northeast Cape Fear River (site 43), and Lumber River (site 45) <br />ranged from 0.025 mg/L at site 45 to 0.246 mg/L at site 43, The <br />highest ammonia concentration (0.246 mg/L) measured among <br />all of the flood samples (table 6) was in the Northeast Cape Fear <br />River and occurred 6 days following the flood peak. Nitrate con- <br />centrations at these three southeast North Carolina sites ranged <br />from 0.015 mg/L at site 45 to 0.330 mg/L at site 40. Median <br />organic nitrogen concentrations at sites 40, 43, and 45 were sim- <br />ilar to median flood-sample concentrations measured in the Tar <br />and Neuse Rivers-about 0.7 mg/L-although the maximum <br />concentration in the Northeast Cape Fear River was 1.1 mg/L. <br />Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations ranged from <br />8.4 to 16 mg/L as carbon (C) in the Tar, Neuse, and Cape Fear <br />Rivers, and 17 to 25 mg/L in the carbon-rich, coastal Northeast <br />Cape Fear and Lumber Rivers. These DOC concentrations in <br />floodwaters generally exceeded the highest DOC concentrations <br />previously measured by the USGS in the Tar and Neuse Rivers <br />during the 1990's (table 8). <br />Floodwaters had two primary effects on nitrogen, phosphorus, <br />and organic carbon. First, floodwaters resulted in tremendous <br />dilution ofthese constituents. For example, the maximum ammo- <br />nia concentration at Tarboro (site 14) was 0,051 mglL on <br />September 21 when the flow was 61,000 fi3/s. If the same mass <br />of ammonia was present at the long-tenn September mean flow <br />of 1,220 fi3/s, then the ammonia concentration would have been <br />2.55 mg/L, or a concentration about 10 times greater than was <br />measured during 1990-99 at the site (table 8). Despite this dilu- <br />tion, maximum concentrations of ammonia, organic nitrogen, <br />total phosphorus, and orthophosphorus were similar to 1990-99 <br />median concentrations, Only nitrate levels were low compared to <br />1990-99 concentrations. The second effect of floodwaters was to <br />export large amounts of organic matter from the floodplains to the <br />streams, as indicated by the high organic nitrogen, DOC, and <br />suspended organic carbon concentrations. The long-term effects <br />of these large loads of organic matter on coastal waters remains <br />to be seen. <br /> <br />Bacteria <br /> <br />Floodwaters from Hurricane Floyd inundated animal waste <br />lagoons in eastern North Carolina, killed tens of thousands of <br /> <br />Two Months of Flooding in Eastern North Carolina, Septcmber--Octobcr 1999 <br />