My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10102
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:55 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:52:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Rainfall-Runoff Modelling and Preliminary Regional Flood Characteristics of Small Rural Watersheds in Arkansas River Basin - Colorado
Date
1/1/1981
Prepared For
CDOT
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />flood-frequency relation for each station was determined by statistically combining <br />the relations developed from the recorded and the synthetic data. Flood- <br />frequency results were then regionalized using both a multiple-regression method <br />and a station-year method. Lastly, a dimensionless hydrograph technique was <br />tested to determine if estimated flood characteristics could be used to develop a <br />reliable synthetic hydrograph. <br /> <br />The principal conclusions of this preliminary analysis are: <br /> <br />1. The results of the multiple-regression and station-year methods <br />were found to be in close agreement; depending on drainage area <br />size, the station-year results were 9 to 23 percent lower for the <br />100-year peak discharge. The regression results should be used <br />to provide the regional estimates of flood characteristics at ungag- <br />ed basins. <br /> <br />2. The magnitude and frequency of floods can be estimated from the <br />effective drainage area with a standard error of estimate of 30 to <br />50 percent. The relations are generally applicable to basins rang- <br />ing in size from about 0.5 to 15 mi', but separate equations for <br />basins less than and greater than 3 mi' were found to give better <br />results. <br /> <br />3. For any peak discharge less than about 13,000 ft3/s, flood volume <br />can be estimated with a standard error of estimate of about <br />62 percent. <br /> <br />4. Using estimated peak discharge and flood volume, a method devel- <br />oped by Craig (1970) provides synthetic flood hydrographs with <br />shapes very similar to the flood hydrographs observed in this <br />study. <br /> <br />5. The flood-frequency and flood-volume relations reported are only <br />applicable to rural basins with natural-flow conditions. However, <br />urbanization resulting in less than 30 percent effective impervious <br />area may not significantly affect these flood characteristics. <br /> <br />SELECTED REFERENCES <br /> <br />Bailey, J. F., and Ray. H. A., 1966, Definition of stage-discharge relation in <br />natural channels by step-backwater analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Water- <br />Supply Paper 1869-A, 21 p. <br />Benson, M. A., 1962, Evolution of methods for evaluating the occurrence of <br />floods: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1580-A, 30 p. <br />Benson, M. A. and Carter, R. W., 1973, A national study of the streamflow <br />data-collection program: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2028, <br />44 p. <br />Bodhaine, G. L., 1968, Measurement of peak discharge at culverts by indirect <br />methods: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investiga- <br />tions, Book 3, Chapter A3, 60 p. <br />Chow, V. T., ed., 1964, Handbook of applied hydrology, a compendium of water- <br />resources technology: New York, McGraw-Hili Book Co., sec. 7, p. 47-48. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.