Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4000 <br /> <br />3500 <br /> <br />3000 <br /> <br />'" <br />z <br />o <br />u <br />~ 2500 <br />'" <br />w <br />Cl. <br />t;; <br />W <br />U- <br />u <br />iii 2000 <br />:::> <br />u <br />z <br /> <br />w <br />'" <br />'" <br /><( 1500 <br />J: <br />U <br /><n <br />o <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />J ~ <br />~ \ <br />I ~ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />J \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />, \ <br />, \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />I ~ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />, \ <br />I \ <br />, \ <br />, \ <br />A \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />1 \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />I \ <br />f \. <br />I "- <br />I "- <br />f "- <br />I "- <br />f "-~ <br />I "-,,- <br />I "- <br />I "'0.-__ <br />-..." <br /> <br />Synthetic flood hydrograp:, (see table 51 <br />Q2s=3950 cubic feet per second <br />V:::; 285 acre-feet <br /> <br />Recorded flood hydrograph (station <br />number 07099250L flood of Sep- <br />tember 13, 1976 <br />Qp =3300 cubic feet per second <br />V=152 acre-feet <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />240 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />40 60 <br /> <br />80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 <br />TIME. IN MINUTES <br /> <br />Figure 7,-- Comparison of a synthetic hydrograph with a recorded hydrograph <br />for an 8.25-square-mile basin. <br /> <br />28 <br />