My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10053
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:11:41 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:49:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
A Study to Identify Attitudes and Problems with Integrating Floodplain Management and Dam Safety
Date
8/1/1984
Prepared For
University of Denver
Prepared By
Stephen A. Spann
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\ <br /> <br />vi <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />is apparent, <br /> <br />the group <br /> <br />had <br /> <br />some difficulty <br /> <br />assigning a value to human life on the same scale as money <br /> <br />and other social <br /> <br />values. <br /> <br />The zero risk outcome to prevent <br /> <br />further development and remove non-conforming structures from <br /> <br />beneath dams was the strongest <br /> <br />preference even <br /> <br />though <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />program would be the most costly. <br /> <br />This attitude manifests itself <br /> <br />strongest <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />nuclear industry and the federal dam program where the design <br /> <br />approaches the zero risk end of the probability scale. In <br /> <br />comparison <br /> <br />with <br /> <br />other <br /> <br />public <br /> <br />works <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />national <br /> <br />infrastructures, <br /> <br />the costs of <br /> <br />safety appear to be out of <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />proportion. <br /> <br />It is evedent that society needs to <br /> <br />identify the <br /> <br />price it is willing to pay for preventing the loss of a human <br /> <br />life in <br /> <br />order to compare program alternatives whether the <br /> <br />program assess dam safety, public health, highway safety, or <br /> <br />any other life risk mitigation program. <br /> <br />The value of life has been defined at random and in a <br /> <br />haphazard <br /> <br />manner <br /> <br />through <br /> <br />highway <br /> <br />safety <br /> <br />investments, <br /> <br />investments or non investments in medical <br /> <br />research, <br /> <br />through <br /> <br />the court <br /> <br />system in wrongful death awards, and the level of <br /> <br />fire and police protection in our cities. <br /> <br />Until society is willing to define the monetary value <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />life, <br /> <br />it <br /> <br />wi 11 <br /> <br />be difficult, <br /> <br />if <br /> <br />not <br /> <br />impossible, <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />establish a rational dam safety program. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.