Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9-03. Planning studies have not progressed to the point of firm <br />levee alignments. As a result, the study to locate and size the in- <br />terior drainage structures and ponding areas mu~t be deferred. Data <br />on these items will be detailed in the g3neral design mamorandum. <br /> <br />9-04. Existing inte~op ~inaqe pattern.- The proposed levee <br />on the left bank would extend about one mile upstream from the U.S. <br />Highway SO bridge. The levee would be south of and parallel to Co)~- <br />rado Highway 194. The state highway is elevated 4 to 5 feet above <br />natural ground and water ponds on the north side of the highway em- <br />bankment. These ponding areas ext~nd north about 500 feet where a <br />steep bluff limits their areal extent. Three small culverts are used <br />to conduct flows under the state highway to the Arkansas River. With <br />the proposed levee in place, it will be necessary to collect the out- <br />flows from these three culverts and convey the combined flow to an out- <br />let through the levee. <br /> <br />9-05. On the right bank, the interior drainage areas lie within <br />the flood plain and are bounded by the Arkansas River on the west, <br />north, and east, and by the AT&SF Railway embankment on the south. <br />The Las Animas Town Ditch and the Consolidated Ditch are elevated 3 <br />to 4 feet above natural ground. The June 1965 flood rendered the in- <br />take structure of the Las Animas Town Ditch ineffective. This ditch <br />now shares the same intake structure as the Consolidated Ditch by use <br />of a connecting lateral. The irrigation ditches and field borders are <br />barriers to storm runoff. Jones Ditch is located at the base of the <br />foothills south of Las Animas and intercepts storm runoff from the <br />foothills. The ditch has a capacity of about 250 c.f.s. and is formed <br />by a downhill levee to facilitate runoff interception. Jones Ditch <br />does not have a history of breaching from storm runoff. Storm runoff <br />exceeding the ditch capacity would spill onto the downhill farmland <br />and be confined to the south of U.S. Highway SO and the AT&SF Railway <br />embankment. This runoff would flow in an easterly direction toward <br />the Purgatoire River and would not be intercepted by the levee system <br />of the proposed project. <br /> <br />9-06. The storm runoff for the city of Las Animas is presently <br />conveyed by five ditches. Two of these ditches empty directly into <br />the Arkansas River, two empty into an abandoned gravel pit just south- <br />east of the U.S. Highway 50 bridge, and one empties into the Purgatoire <br />River. As shOWn on plate 19, the two ditches that empty into the Ar- <br />kansas River are located parallel to and just west of the approach to <br />the U.S. Highway SO bridge. Another ditch is located on the east side <br />of the approach to the bridge and drains into an abandoned gravel pit. <br />The ditch that drains the northeast section of the city also empties <br />into the gravel pit. Drainage from th~ southern section of the city <br />is collected into a ditch that runs east, parallel to and south of <br />the AT&SF Railway to the Purgatoire River. <br /> <br />29 <br />