Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Andy Briscoe <br />3 September 1969 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrology <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A hydrologic analysis was undertaken to detemine the size and shape <br />of the IOO-year stom runoff hydrograph. The cri teri a presented in the <br />Denver Regional Council of Governments' Urban Storn [lrainage Criteria <br />Manual were utilized. The rainfall for the Sunshine Gulch drainage <br />basin is presented in Figure I. The Colorado ~rban ,'ydrograph Pro- <br />cedure "laS used \dth the CltlP <'rograr". The resulting computer print- <br />out is sh",m in Figure 2. Coefficients suitable for tnis rural type <br />basin were uti 1 ized. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The resulting hydrograph shovln in tabular forn in Fiuure 2,.las then <br />plotted on graph paper and modifications 'Iere ;lade to account for the <br />numerous upstream ponding areas caused by undersized road culvert5. <br />and the fact that un~lanned storm runoff detention Iii I J occur Juring <br />the iOO-year sturm runoff. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The resulting flood hydrograph, for design pur~oses, I.'as detemine,; <br />to have a volume of 160 acre-feet and a peak discharge of 1,000 cfs. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />An investigation of the sedir,lent probler.1s \,,!;ich !.ligl:t re~ult fro!.l <br />serious erosion in the upstream basin during a "iljOt. stom, indi:ateJ <br />that the nunlerous ponding areas vlould hold back rluch of the sediment <br />and boulders "Ihich often are carried dO"1n oy the flond ,.,ilters. Itu",ever, <br />deposition must be considered in any dO'..m strCJ~ channel rlar~njng and <br />for this reason the I'aster Plan is based upon design flO\.'s of ',isher- <br />than-usual velocities so that the sediClent car, be c~rried dO'.", ;nco <br />C001der Creek to a significant degree. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Flood Plain <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />/\ f;eld instrument survey ViaS performed on SUllshine Gulcil tu defir:c <br />cross sections at critical locations and to Jeterr,ine the aCLual slope <br />of the existing channel. The cross sections clearly indicated the <br />basic problem existing on Sunshine Gulch, i.e., the alluviur:: \"/hich <br />has been bui It up at the mouth of Sunshine Gulch has cO'lpletely el ini- <br />nated any semblance of a natural flood plain. The topography is such <br />tha t once "a te rs I eave the chanjf I they f I (J" to 10,.'- I Y i n9 U rounds <br />lying primari Iy to the east. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Farmers Ditch area has been si Ited and the original capacity of <br />the overshoot reduced sufficiently to Ciluse the lOa-year flood to <br />flO\/ into the ditch and to continue dovln the ditch to the first re- <br />striction which \~ould then cause it to overtop, flooding those areas <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />