<br />JARREIT AND TOMLINSON: R!3GIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY PALEOFLOOD METIlOD
<br />
<br />River basins, subalpine forests consisting of aspen, lodgepole.'
<br />pine, Douglas fir, and Engelmann spruce are common. In most
<br />lower parts of Elkhead Creek basin anc;l Yampa River basin
<br />below Steamboat Springs, vegetation consists primarily of pi-
<br />non pine, juniper, sagebrush, rabbit brush, and na':ive grasses.
<br />Mean annual precipitation in the basin varies from about
<br />405 mm at Elkhead reservoir to slightly more than 760 mm
<br />near the headwaters [Doesken et al., 1984]. Most annual pre-
<br />cipitation falls as snow in the winter months. The largest pre-
<br />cipitation amounts are limited to small parts of the basin at the
<br />highest elevations around the east and north rims of the basin.
<br />Within the larger context of the regional study area, mean
<br />annual precipitation ranges from over 1525 mm in the Park
<br />Range (the wettest area in Colorado) to 305 mm near Maybell
<br />to 406 mm at Meeker [Doesken et 01., 1984]. Frequent, local-
<br />ized convective rainstorms occur during the summer months.
<br />Convective storms have produced moderate flooding in small,
<br />steep basins with little vegetation at lower elevatio:ls in northM
<br />western Colorado [JafTett, 1987]. These basins are. located in
<br />the western parts of the regional study area, particularly
<br />Piceance Creek and Yellow Creek basins. General rainstorms
<br />in northwestern Colorado can cover large areas but have not
<br />produced substantial flooding in historic times.
<br />Flood-frequency analysis has long been done as:;uming staM
<br />tionarity of climatic and hydrologic processes [Interagency Ad.
<br />visory Committee on Water Data, 1981; NRC, 1999]. There is
<br />growing concern that climate naturally varies witn time and
<br />that climate may be responding to anthropogenic effects; how-
<br />ever, at present (2000), there is little information to assess
<br />these impacts on average or extteme conditions [NRC, 1999].
<br />Lills and Slack [1999] analyzed contemporary peak streamflow
<br />data in the United States and were not able to detect signifi-
<br />cant trends. Knox [1993] documented increases in flood mag.
<br />nitude due to climate change in the upper Mississippi River
<br />basin, but these results are site.specific. Ely [1997] suggests
<br />evidence for climate and flood flow change over the last 1000
<br />years, particularly the last 2 centuries in the scuthwestem
<br />United States. England [1998] noted that no expl,.nation was
<br />provided for the apparent increase in floods and hat only six
<br />of Ely's [1997] 19 sites have records equal to or greater than
<br />1000 years. Of equal importance, is that Ely's [1997] study does
<br />not account for large uncertainties in estimating flood dis-
<br />charge averaging 60% as noted by Ja"ett [1986, 1S'87, 1994].
<br />Few climate change studies have been done for the Rocky
<br />Mountain region. Paleoclimatic studies by Madole [1986], Elias
<br />[1996]. Menounos and Reasoner [1997]. Valero-Garces et 01.
<br />[1997], Fredlund and Tieszen [1997], Smith and Betancourt
<br />[1998], and Vierling [1998] used dendrochronology, pollen, di.
<br />atoms, fossil bettle assemblages, carbonate geochemistry, iso-
<br />topic evidence, and sediment stratigraphy, respectively, to docM
<br />ument mean temperature and precipitation fluctuations. These
<br />research results are in good agreement that warming temper-
<br />atures resulted in deglaciation of high mountain are as between
<br />about 13,000 and 12,000 years B.P. and that mod'~rn climate
<br />began about 9500 to 9000 yrs B.P. In this period of modern
<br />climate, average temperatures varied :t IOta 20C from cantem.
<br />parary mean summer temperatures. Average annual precipi-
<br />tation and average annual streamflow have varied by up to
<br />about 50% of modern mean values, but nearly similar varia-
<br />tions have occurred during contemporary records [Jal7ett,
<br />1991). However, inferring extreme variations from studies of
<br />average climate change is problematic. For example, extreme
<br />floods in Colorado such as resulted from the 1935 Hale and
<br />
<br />2961
<br />
<br />1976 Big Thompson floods were imbedded in one of the worst
<br />droughts in contemporary records, whereas other extreme
<br />floods have occurred during wet periods, such as the 1965 Plum
<br />Creek flood [Collins et 01., 1991]. The paleoflood data de.
<br />scribed i~ this report provide a means to aSSess the effects of
<br />climate change on large floods during the Holocene.
<br />
<br />4. Methodology
<br />
<br />This section describes methods used to estimate paleoflood
<br />discharge, determine the paleoflood chronology, analyze re-
<br />gional precipitation and streamflow data, and conduct flood.
<br />frequency analyses. The strategy of a paleoflood investigation
<br />is to visit the. most likely places where evidence of substantial
<br />flooding, if. any, might be preserved. Because glaciation and
<br />glacial outwash "erases" evidence of floods, paleoflood eviM
<br />dence gen"erally can be no older than the time since the last
<br />period of glaciation or about 12,000 years ago in the Rocky
<br />Mountains [Madole, 1991a]. For unglaciated basins the objec-
<br />tive was to identify the largest flood that has occurred within
<br />the longest time period but limited to the Holocene when the
<br />climate variability has been relatively constant. Thus paleo-
<br />flood investigations can identify physical evidence for the OCM
<br />currence or nonoccurrence of substantial floods for very long
<br />time periods. Paleoflood data were collected for sites on Elk.
<br />head Creek and its tributaries and from numerous streams in
<br />the Yampa, White, and Little Snake Rivers basins in north-
<br />western Colorado.
<br />
<br />4.1. Paieoflood Discharge
<br />
<br />Floods leave distinctive deposits and landforms in and along
<br />stream channeis, as well as botanic evidence [Baker, 1987;
<br />Baker et 01., 1988; Jal7ett, 1987, 1990b, 1991; Hupp, 1988].
<br />Slack-water deposits of sand-sized particles [Kochel and Baker,
<br />1982; Baker et 01" 1988J, flood scars on trees, erosion scars, and
<br />bouldery flood-bar deposits commonly are used as indicators
<br />of past flood levels called paleostage indicators (PSIs) (Figure
<br />2). When flows are large enough, streambed and bank mate.
<br />rials are mobilized and transported [Costa, 1983; Komar, 1987;
<br />Wilcock, 1992]. Such mobilization and transport are a function
<br />of channel gradient. As gradient increases, smaller velocities
<br />and depths are required to move sediment on the bed of a
<br />stream [Costa, 1983]. When stream velocity, depth, and slope
<br />decrease, flowing water often is no longer competent to trans-
<br />port sediments, which are deposited as flood bars and slack-
<br />water deposits in the channel or on the floodplain (e.g., Figures
<br />3 and 4). The types of sites where flow competence decreases
<br />and flood deposits commonly are found and studied include
<br />(1) locations of rapid energy dissipation, where transported
<br />sediments would be deposited, such as tributary junctions,
<br />reaches of decreased channel gradient, abrupt channel expan-
<br />sions, or reaches of increased flow depth; (2) locations along
<br />the sides of valleys in wide, expanding reaches where fine-
<br />grained sediments or slack-water deposits would likely be de-
<br />posited; (3) ponded areas upstream from channel contractions;
<br />(4) the inside of bends or overbank areas on the outside of
<br />bends; and (5) locations downstream from moraines across
<br />valley floors where large floods would likely deposit sediments
<br />eroded from the moraines. Flood-transported sediments and
<br />woody debris can scar trees (Figure 5) and also accumulate on
<br />trees and other obstructions to provide a good indicator of
<br />flood height. The height of tree scars and the top of woody
<br />debris are used as indicators of approximate flood height [Har-
<br />
<br />~
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I.
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />
|