<br />2960 .
<br />
<br />JARRElT AND TOMLINSON: REGiONAL INTERDiSCIPLINARY PALEOFLOOD METI10D
<br />
<br />t
<br />
<br />tfeme precipitation in the mountains of Wyoming. Tomlinson.~
<br />and Solak [1994, 1997] developed a site-specific methodoiogy
<br />to determine PMP/PMF estimates. Jensen [1995] developed
<br />new criteria for computing PM? estimates for short-duration.
<br />small-area storms in Utah. His study resulted in significant
<br />decreases in extreme precipitation for Utah compared to cur.
<br />rently used PMP estimates [Hansen el aI., 1977J.
<br />Large differences in estimates of extreme rainfall and flood-
<br />ing have substantial effects on dam safety. For example, a
<br />paieoflood study was conducted for the Bureau of Reclamation
<br />for Olympus Dam in Estes Park, Colorado, on the Big Thomp-
<br />son River [JaITell and CosIo, 1988]. Olympus Dam is iocated at
<br />an elevation of 2300 m, and the spillway was designed for a
<br />PMF of 637 m' S-I. However, a revised PMF (Bureau of
<br />Reclamation, written communication, 1988), based on the re-
<br />vised PMP estimates [Hansen el 01., 1988], is 2380 m' S-I.
<br />Paleoflood investigations by Jamll and COSIo [1988J indicated
<br />that the largest natural fiood flow in the Big Thompson River
<br />upstream from Olympus Dam is 142 m' s" (6% of the revised
<br />PM F) during at least the past 10,000 years (since glaciation).
<br />This paleoflood information and a review of the existing and
<br />revised PMF values by the Bureau of Reclamation resulted in
<br />a decision not to modify the spillway for Olympus Dam at an
<br />estimated cost of $10 million (Bureau of Reclamation, written
<br />communication, 1988).
<br />In part because of the interdisciplinary research, concerns
<br />and questions of extreme rainfall and flood design values for
<br />structures located in floodplains have been raised by state and
<br />fcdcral dam safety officials for the Rocky Mountains. Most
<br />state agencies in the Rocky Mountain region have ongoing
<br />hydromctcorologic and paleoflood studies to revise methodol-
<br />ogies to estimatc extreme precipitation and flooding for dam
<br />safety because of recognizcd deficiencies in PM? estimates in
<br />mountainous areas. Colorado began studies to develop new
<br />methods to estimate extreme rainfall in the mountains [McKee
<br />alld Doesken, 1997], and the sccond, 30-month phase recently
<br />began (A. Pearson, Colorado Dam Safety Office, written com-
<br />munication, 1999). The Bureau of Reclamation recently began
<br />a program to use a risk-based assessment, which incorporates
<br />paleoflood investigations to provide estimates of the magni-
<br />tude and frequency of extreme floods, to assist with dam safety
<br />decision making [Levish elal., 1994; OSlellaa and Levish, 1995J.
<br />The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is impiementing a risk
<br />assessment method to evaluate potential safety problems for
<br />its more than 550 dams to aid decision makers in prioritizing
<br />investment decisions [Foster, 1999]. In 1999 the American So-
<br />ciety of Civil Engineers began a task committee on paleoflood
<br />hydrology as it relates to dam safety and risk-based assess-
<br />ments. The NRC [1988, p. 111] states that "Nonetheiess, the
<br />expense of such studies is minor in relation to planning costs
<br />for major high-risk projects such as nuclear power plants or
<br />large dams. At present these opportunities are largely being
<br />ignored. . . . For critical projects the paieoftood data should at
<br />least be collected, appropriately weighed, and considered in
<br />the overall decision process leading to design." Thus it is im-
<br />portant to develop methodologies that can be used by dam
<br />safety officials to make decisions about the probabilities of
<br />extreme floods.
<br />
<br />3. Study Area
<br />
<br />The Yampa River in northwestern Colorado originates on
<br />the White River Plateau (aiso known as the Flattops with a
<br />
<br />maximum elevation of 3808 m) and flows westerly through the
<br />Gore (3295 m), Rabbit Ears (3748 m), and Park (3725 m)
<br />moun1ain ranges (Figure I). The White River originates on the
<br />White River Plateau and also flows westerly. The boundary
<br />between,northwestern and southwestern Coiorado is defined
<br />by the topographic divide between the White River and Col-
<br />orado River basins (Figure 1), which has elevations ranging
<br />from about 2500 to 3800 m. Elevations at the downstream
<br />study limit are 1804 m at Maybell in the Yampa River basin
<br />and 1898 m at Meeker in the White River basin. Major Yampa
<br />tributaries include the Elk and Uttle Snake Rivers and Eik-
<br />head and Fortification Creeks. The regionai study area is ap-
<br />proximately 10,900 km'.
<br />ElkheadCreek has its headwaters in the Eikhead Mountains
<br />and flows southwesterly to its confluence with the Yampa
<br />River about 10 km east of Craig (Figure I). Elkhead Creek
<br />basin has a drainage area of 531 km' at Elkhead dam. Eieva-
<br />tions in the basin range from about 3307 m at the highest peak
<br />of the Elkhead Mountains to about 1890 m at its confiuence
<br />with the Yampa River. The elevation of Elkhead Reservoir is
<br />about 1950 m. Distinct mountains and ridges define the north
<br />(-2900 m), east (-2400 m), and west (-2300 m) boundaries
<br />of the basin. The topography is rolling hills and valleys, except
<br />in the steeper, mountainous headwater areas. Elkhead Creek
<br />and numerous tributaries drain the mountains forming the
<br />basin boundary. Most streams in the study area are of bigher
<br />gradient with slopes greater than 0.002 m m-1 [Jamll, 1984],
<br />except the lower reaches of Elkhead Creek and the lower
<br />Yampa River. Cobble- and boulder-sized material make up the
<br />stream bed and fine.graioed sediments compose the fiood-
<br />plain. Some lower-elevation tributary valleys to the Yampa and
<br />White Rivers are predominantly fine-grained alluvial fill.
<br />Elkhcad Creek basin is underlain by Cretaceous and Ter-
<br />tiary rocks (shale, sandstone, conglomerate, and coals) in the
<br />Lance, Lewis, Wasatch, Browns Park, Fort Union, and nes
<br />formations; upper Tertiary intrusive rock, primarily porhyries
<br />of intermediate and basaltic composition, cover parts of the
<br />basin [Twe!o, 1976]. Within the generai study area, similar
<br />geologic fonnations as in Elkhead Creek basin with Precam-
<br />brian rocks (granite, Quartz monzonite, granodiorite, Quartz
<br />diorite, and gabbro) and biotite and hornblend gneisses occur
<br />in the Park Range. Tertiary andesitic and basaltic lava flows
<br />from the Flattops and Elkhead Mountains with some intrusive
<br />rocks in the study area [Twelo, 1976]. Most of the Park Range,
<br />upper Elkhead Creek basin, and the Flattops experienced at
<br />least three Pieistocene giaciations [Madole, 1982, 1989, 1991a,
<br />1991b, 199Ic]. Rights of Pieistocene terraces along the Yampa
<br />River from .about Steamboat Springs downstream to about
<br />Craig, probably from glacial processes, ringe from about a
<br />meter (early Holocene) to 183 m (620 ka) above the present
<br />f1oodpiain; the average incision rate since 600 ka is 0.11 m ka-1
<br />[Madole, 1991a]. Ungiaciated tributaries lack the well-
<br />developed Pleistocene terraces, and Holocene terraces are rel-
<br />atively close to the valley floors [Madole, 1991aJ. Loess, typi-
<br />cally 1.3 to 2 m thick, of at least two ages is widespread in the
<br />Yampa River basin with the latest deposition in the late Pleis-
<br />tocene and possibly early Holocene [Madole, 199Ia].
<br />The majority of Elkhead Creek basin and regional study
<br />area has been mapped as low to moderately well-drained soils,
<br />except in limited higher elevation areas where bedrock is at or
<br />near the ground surface [Soil Conservation Service, 1982; Nat-
<br />ural Resol/rces Conservalion Service, 2000]. At higher elevations
<br />in Elkhead Creek and the upper Yampa River and White
<br />
<br />t'
<br />?
<br />;/
<br />
<br />.{
<br />~
<br />
|