FLOOD09522

• County: Logan
• Community: Sterling, Atwood
• Basin: South Platte
• Title: Pawnee Creek Flood Mitigation, City of Sterling, Town of Atwood and Logan County
• Date: 7/1/1999
• Prepared For: Logan County
• Prepared By: URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration

I

U.S. Department of Agriculture

I

FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING

PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency)
I Nome Of p,

f,.f) 'u..l-

~ at

t
if"''' e C;,.
Proposed Land Use
Fl
I PART II (To e completed by SCS) Date ReqU~ t Received ~B'r' SCS

Does the site contai~ prime, unique, statewide or tocal important farmland? Ve} No Acres Irrigated
(II no, the FPPA does not apply - do not complete additional parts 01 this form). 0 0 LL

I

I

,
Major Crop(sJ Farmable Land In Govt. JurisdictIOn I Amount Of Farmland As -Defined in FPPA
(f>ftl 5IJaa.L1~~.l;b_.-,1lfalf;l Acres: q:SQ..J,.qQQ % M.:" Acres: 19.(J. ~a:! % Ido.:;
Name Of Land E luation System Used Name Of Local Site Assessment System Date Land Evaluatlon Returned BV SCS
I ~f,t:I. - il...-v:\ .:0 1m
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternati e SltP Rating
Site A $Ite 6 I $Ite C Site 0
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly ~.3 CZ8) ~~ (Z8)..:
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly I 0 0 I
C. Total Acres In Site , '15 ""
PART IV (To be completed bySCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland I"> _"l l"o.=>
B. Total Acres Statewide. And local Important Farmland I ,~ I"
C. Percentage Of Farmland In County Or local Govt: Unit To Be Converted ,""" .~I
D. Percentage Of Farmland In Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value ,?'..-<: ,... <"
PART V (To be completed by SCSI land Evaluation Criterion Po;:) A.. '1
Relative Value Of Farmland To Be Converted (Scale 010 to 100 Points)
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Maximum I I
Site Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CF R 658.5(b) Points I I
I
1. Area In Nonurban Use 150 t /II I~ I
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use 10 /0 I I" I
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed :10 ,,, I I" :
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government "" I 0 I 'D
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area ~ /I I t?
6. Distance To Urban Support Services I ,., I 0 n
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average ! .n ! 10 If)
B. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland ~ , () 0
9. Availebility Of Farm Sunport Services ~ I 5 I 5
10. On-Farm Investments I/() I NJ 10
I
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services ~'" , 0 0 I
I I
12. Compatibility With Existing Anricultural Use .0 , 2. Z.
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 I (.,~ ~7
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 ~ 2 gz.
rotal Site Asserment (From Part VI above or a local 160 (pI, t>7
site assessment
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines) 260 If f 11/1
T Date Of Selection 5";'~/99 Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Site Selected: 'tf' Ves 0 No 0

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I Reason For;;:;'''}es Ia.Yf~$1 CVH10J- llf FiooJ profevh~ ~
i~ad ~ 5;fl1;r:c.....J (b-rrv./~ r($()u.vc.t..S.

has

stili!!;

10 <<J"f"

I

IIZ" .. .,.. \f.... G-o"-shJ....f f\o.J4 o...e. pkMlt~ It, he. ~ ., 'Y't"fJ.,). err(W,
I ..jl.G."'~.. ..............

Form AD.tOOG (10-83)

(See Instruction:> on reverse side)