Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />of wetlands-type vegetation running generally parallel <br />to the river. The area in lot 4-5 immediately adja- <br />cent to the river and the area in lots 2-4 lying be- <br />tween the wetlands bands are slightly elevated, and <br />drier with grass and sagebrush cover. Most of the <br />upper bench area is presently irrigated hay meadow. <br />The river bank slopes fairly steeply down to the level <br />of the river channel. Most of the site is open and <br />grassy, except for the wetlands vegetation mentioned <br />above, a fringe of willows, cottonwoods, and some pine <br />along the river, and scattered pine in lots 4 & 5. <br />Lot 5 has an old railroad embankment running northerly <br />through the lot. The southwest tip of Phase 2, adja- <br />cent to CR 620 and the Colorado River was used for <br />disposal of excess soils resulting from the trout pond <br />excavation in early 1984. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />SOILS <br /> <br />Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. performed soils <br />exploration and testing at the site in October 1984. <br />Their report is included as Appendix 'B'. Their work <br />generally consisted of excavating seven test pits at <br />the proposed homesites and ground water monitoring. <br />The soils were found to be substantially river allu- <br />vium. Soils in the upper bench sites were silty to <br />clayey sands and gravels. Soils in the lower bench <br />sites were very clean sands and gravels. Both soils <br />have suitable construction properties. <br /> <br />Surprisingly, ground water was encountered in only one <br />test pit, at building site 4; after 10 days it had <br />risen to 6.5 feet below surface. The soils technician <br />did not detect any staining, etc. of the soils to in- <br />dicate the limit of higher ground water levels. How- <br />ever, observations of the site during spring and sum- <br />mer definitely show standing water in the wetlands <br />areas. It seems, therefore, that the water levels <br />visually observed are related to spring snow melt and <br />summer irrigation, and that the relatively free drain- <br />ing soils allow water levels to drop rapidly later in <br />the year. Although the soils report is not definitive <br />in this respect, we recommend that all house founda- <br />tions be designed based on a probable high ground <br />water level. <br /> <br />100YR FLOOD PLAIN <br /> <br />Rocky Mountain Engineers, Inc. has performed a Flood <br />Study for the Colorado River at the Phase 2 location <br />and the study is included as Appendix 'B'. This is a <br />difficult study, since projections of flood flows at <br />the site are dependent upon evaluation of Granby Res- <br />ervoir conditions and operating procedures. Granby <br />Reservoir is not a flood control facility, and its <br />operator, the United States Bureau of Reclamation, has <br />