Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 1 <br /> <br />CHilPTERV <br />HYQRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />TAgLE OF lDO-YEAR ~ISCHARGES <br /> <br />Hydraulic Procedures <br /> <br />LOCATICN <br /> <br />DRA1NAGEAREA <br />{SquJree:i1es) <br /> <br />lOO-YEAR <br />Oischarge <br /> <br />X-SeeSG <br /> <br />North of High St. <br />(Subloasin from N',,') <br /> <br />1.67mi2 <br /> <br />630 cfs <br /> <br />Hydrau 1 ic ~na lys i s for thi s study inc 1 uded cO~lputat ion of water sur- <br />face elevations and profiles along the drainage ways and their tributaries <br />to the limits of the study area. b'ater surface elevations were computed <br />fro~ the cross section of the cha~nel. channel roughness coefficients, <br />~nd bridge hydraulic and structurdl characteristics utilizing the Corps <br />of E~gineers HoC-2 conputer program. <br />Results of the lOO-year frequency flood computatiQ~s' are shown on <br />T hl~" Th~ '"'' ,.~"~ ~_~",.,c,y 'I'"d _~~~". I'e .C."",e ,_ ~','~' 'C <br />.J.u"_ ... ,"~ 'V~-JL~' "~~~" ,~v ~'V"'~ ~ '''~~,''"'' c~,-,~ <br /> <br />X-See BO f,orth of High St. l.Olmi2 926 efs <br /> (SHhnil';1n fr~,,- N~ ) <br />X-See SF South of Higll SL 2.68 ., :G50 efs <br />m <br />X-SccE3 South of So~tn SL 3.17 , 1450 ,fs <br />", <br /> <br />~ -Sf'( ~}: <br /> <br />South of H~rdin9 <br /> <br />(p~rt cf a~'IC arN) <br /> <br />738 ds <br /> <br />throJgh21. Cross sections used were tltoseobtained frO:1lfield sL.rveys <br />arid topogr~pJ1ic maps. The loe~t ion of the cross sections are sho,,~ on <br />the flooded area "'~ps for the lOQ-year flood i~ Plates 3 through 14, J~d <br />on the flood profiles on 1'1 ~tes 15 tllrougll 21. <br />Water surface elevations pl'esented in Table 1I ore bosed on COII'PU- <br />tJtiolls JSSJming no redoctior.s ill lhe Chonn", or hydraul ic ~trucbr", <br />convey~r.ce c~pabi 1 i ties. Such reuuctions. d"~ to debris o(;eu",~l Jtion. <br />arc likely to occur doring flood flow periods resulting i~ higher water <br />surface elevations. <br />Chan~el roughness f~ctors Wdn~ing's "n") for these cc""putatio~s <br />were a~si'lned on the basi s of field inspection of the floodplain areas, <br />and ranged from .035 to .065. <br />A detailed description of the hydraulk analysis is included in the <br /> <br />:(- See ,~,D <br /> <br />~or~~ of ~Jrj;r.g <br /> <br />'S" .1 <br />..,,::11 <br /> <br />3S8 ds <br /> <br />X-Sec <br /> <br />S <br /> <br />North of Central <br /> <br />4.75 <br /> <br />1 <br />'01 <br /> <br />i660 cfs <br /> <br />Tec~~~;c31 Addcr.d~~. <br /> <br />X-See <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />~orth Of Kou~tl Av~. <br /> <br />5.53 <br /> <br />.1 <br />Cll <br /> <br />2380cf, <br /> <br />Flood~lain Subdivision <br /> <br />The lOO-y~dr floodplain in this study has been sub~ivided into a <br />f100U....dy Iii i ~h h~l~rd) area and a floodfringe (1ow h,ndrd) ~r!'a. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />c, <br /> <br />I <br />