Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.5 Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br /> <br />The analyses of hydraulic characteristics of Fossil Creek, Stanton Creek, <br /> <br /> <br />Lang Gulch, Smith Creek and Burns Tributary were conducted to determine water- <br /> <br /> <br />surface elevations for peak flows based on existing and developed conditions <br /> <br /> <br />for 2-, 5-, 10-, 50-, 100- and 500-year recurrence interval floods. The <br /> <br /> <br />water-surface elevations were computed using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' <br /> <br /> <br />HEQ-2 (ref. 20). Digitized cross sections were based on 1977 photogrammetry. <br /> <br /> <br />Additional cross sections along Stanton Creek were taken from City topographic <br /> <br /> <br />maps. Bridge and culvert geometries were field measured. Elevations at the <br /> <br /> <br />center lines of channel crossings and channels were obtained from the <br /> <br /> <br />topographic mapping and used to determine channel inverts and low chord eleva- <br /> <br />tions. Roughness coefficients were estimated from field reconnaissance and <br /> <br /> <br />review of photographs taken during the reconnaissance. A summary of the esti- <br /> <br /> <br />mated roughness coefficients has been presented in a separate document titled, <br /> <br />"Documentation for Selection of Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Fossil <br /> <br /> <br />Creek Basin," (ref. 18). The roughness coefficients range from 0.03 to 0.04 <br /> <br /> <br />along the channel and from 0.035 to 0.05 along the overbanks. <br /> <br /> <br />The storm water is mostly confined to the channel, overbanks and ponded <br /> <br /> <br />areas behind embankments. Along Lang Gulch where it crosses Trilby Road <br /> <br /> <br />(County Road 34), approximately 35 cfs flows along the east side of the C&S <br /> <br />Railroad #3 and returns to Lang Gulch at the downstream C&S Railroad crossing <br /> <br /> <br />#2 during the 100-year flood for developed conditions. <br /> <br /> <br />Hydraulics of bridges and culverts were calculated separately as a check <br /> <br />on the HEC-2 calculations. Bridge and culvert capacities are listed in Table <br /> <br /> <br />9. Debris blockage Aas not considered to b~ significant because an inspection <br /> <br /> <br />of the flood plain showed limited sources of large debris. There is capacity <br /> <br /> <br />for the 100-year flow at Fossil Creek and Highway 287, Fossil Creek and the <br /> <br />C&S Railroad, Lang Gulch and C&S Railroad #1 and Lang Gulch and C&S Railroad <br /> <br /> <br />#2. The remaining crossings pond water, and of those the following major <br /> <br /> <br />crossings are overtopped; Fossil Creek at Timberline Road (County Road 11), <br /> <br /> <br />at Trilby Road (County Road 34), at Lemay Avenue (County Road 13), and at <br /> <br /> <br />Shields Street; Stanton Creek at County Road 32 and at Lemay Avenue (County <br /> <br />Road 13); and Lang Gulch at Trilby Road (COunty Road 34), at C&S Railroad #3 <br /> <br /> <br />and at Shields Street. <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />Cross-section location, channel bottom elevation, bridge and road loca- <br /> <br />tions and water surface profiles for the 10-, 50-, 100- and 500-year floods <br /> <br /> <br />existing and developed conditions for Fossil Creek, Stanton Creek, Lang Gulch, <br /> <br />Smith Creek and Burns Tributary are presented in Plates 1 through 74. Channel <br /> <br /> <br />stationing, channel elevation, discharges and corresponding water-surface ele- <br /> <br /> <br />vations for each cross section are presented in Tables 10 through 19. The <br /> <br />discharges represent the 2-, 5-, 10-, 50-, 100- and 500-year floods for <br /> <br /> <br />existing and developed conditions. <br />