My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09447
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09447
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:17 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:19:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Malta Montana
Basin
Statewide
Title
Reconnaissance Report Flood Control for Milk River at Malta Montana
Date
12/1/1991
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />concrete pipe with emergency slide gates in addition to automatic flap <br />gates. The basic reasons underlying the need for emergency slide gates <br />on these structures are the long duration of relatively high stages of the <br />Milk River for the levee design condition, high submergence depths for the <br />outlet inverts of the structures, and the unavailability of adequate <br />ponding areas within the protected area. <br /> <br />Costs for the project <br /> <br /> <br />include construction, or first <br /> <br /> <br />costs, and investllent costs. <br /> <br /> <br />Construction costs are the costs incurred in building the project. Total <br /> <br /> <br />investment costs include interest during the construction period added to <br /> <br /> <br />the construction costs. This is for the purpose of economic evaluation. <br /> <br />Economic AnalTsis, Bene- <br /> <br /> <br />fits are based on damages pre- <br /> <br /> <br />vented to structures and their <br /> <br /> <br />contents as well as external <br /> <br />components. <br /> <br />These benefits <br /> <br />were assigned based on the <br /> <br /> <br />level of protection provided by <br /> <br /> <br />the levees. Benefits for each <br /> <br /> <br />alignment are presented in <br /> <br />table 6. <br /> <br />.i .' .,.'...'...V~I~'.{i.,.,',....... <br />'loOcI Cclntr<lt......fftt lil~Leweo <br />.' .t.SOOClt <br /> <br />L...I <If A/nloL .,...." ...Iduel{.bl.tl"' ... <br />Pr<lttctlOll leneflt......D...;ea.Arnlot D_ges . <br /> <br />AII~ 1. <br />lOO-Y..r <br />500- Y..r <br /> <br />lllv->t <br />IOCI-y..r <br />. 5OG-Y_ <br /> <br /> <br />AI.I~2 <br />lOO-Y_, <br />. 500-Y_ <br /> <br />'-.:'- ..-'-. <br />',--,.'- ',' <br /> <br />AII_n <br />lOG-fur .. <br />500-f_ <br /> <br />Both the lOO-year and 500-year levee designs for subarea 1 were found <br />to be economically feasible. All other levee alternatives had costs that <br />greatly exceeded the benefits which would be derived. Tables 7 and 8 pre- <br />sent the benefit-cost analysis for the levee designs evaluated. An <br />economnomic life of 100 years was used at the current interest rate of <br />8.875 percent. Operation and maintenance (0&1{) costs are based on current <br />O&M expenditures at siailar projects. <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.