My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09447
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09447
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:09:17 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:19:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Malta Montana
Basin
Statewide
Title
Reconnaissance Report Flood Control for Milk River at Malta Montana
Date
12/1/1991
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />After the crosa,sectional dats vere received fro. FEKA, they vere <br />coded into HEC-2 format and run vith the FIS discharges to compare vith <br />the FIS for Malta. The nev IIOdel compared to within 0.2 foot of the <br />profiles furnished vith the cross-sectional date from FEKA. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXISTING CONDITIONS <br />After the FIS IIOdal vas verified, the aodal discharges vere changed <br />to those computed for the reconnaisaance study. 'lbe effective flow arees <br />vere checked and changed slightly, especially around the U.S. Highway 2 <br />and railroad bridges. 'lbe effective flow areas were adjusted to smooth <br />out their outlines, but this had a negligible effect on the overall vater <br />surface profiles. So.e alterations were IlAda in the way the three bridges <br />were modeled, but the effects on the vater surface profiles vere negli- <br />gible. The "n" values were increased fro. those used in the FIS to better <br />match a high-vater mark set in 1986 for an event vith 14,800 c.f.s. (about <br />a 25-year event). The channel "n" value was increased 15 percent to 0.052 <br />to reflect the meandering of the Kilk River, and the overbank "n" value <br />vas increased to 0.065 to reflect the light brush and trees present (Open- <br />Channel Hydraulics, Chov, 1959, pp. 109-113). 'lbe 1986 high-vater IlArk <br />elevation was taken downstream fro. the foresight levee; therefore, no <br />adjustment vas necessary. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The existing foresight levee vas assumed to be inadequate and vas <br />failed in all existing-conditions models. Existing-conditions vater <br />surface profiles were computed and are shown on plate 2 vith the computed <br />FIS vater surface profiles. The maxi_ difference between the FIS water <br />surface profiles and the existing-conditions profiles vas 1.5 feet for the <br />10-year event and 1 foot for events above 10 years. The FIS water surface <br />profiles and the existing-conditions profiles were similar enough that <br />they were assumed to have the same flooded areas. Therefore, the flood <br />boundaries shown in the FIS report were used for existing conditions and <br />are shown on plate 3. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.