Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />supplemented the COE gage data with three additional years of flow records <br />and recomputed the peak discharges to check the COE results. It was found <br />that there is little change in the values of the discharges for the 10-, <br />50-, 100- and SOD-year recurrence intervals when the same procedure is <br />performed. This result is shown in Figure 6. It was therefore recommended <br />that the peak discharges developed in Reference 7 be used in the flood <br />insurance study of the Arkansas River at La Junta (refer to COM's letter to <br />FEMA and CWCB, June 4, 1980, contained in Appendix Bl. These flow rates <br />have also been summarized in Table 1. <br /> <br />City of Lamar, Colorado <br /> <br />The streams studied in the flood insurance study for Lamar, Colorado are <br />Willow Creek and the Arkansas River {see Appendix B for stream locationsl. <br />The literature search carried out for the City of Lamar flood study <br />included a review of the COE "Review Survey for Water Resource Development, <br />Lamar, Colorado and Vicinity, Hydrology," Revised in 1974 (Reference 61. <br />This report contained a detailed hydrologic analysis for Willow Creek and <br />the Arkansas River at Lamar. Peak discharges for the 10-, 50-, 100- and <br />SOD-year recurrence intervals were estimated. <br /> <br />The COE analysis of Willow Creek at Lamar utilized TM-l (Reference II, to <br />estimate the peak flow rates at various locations along Willow Creek. COM <br />reviewed the basin data calculated by the COE as well as the application of <br />Reference 1 and found no errors in the hydrologic computations. Due to the <br />short records of gage data for plains region streams tributary to the <br />Arkansas River, no attempt was made to check regional discharge <br /> <br />12 <br />