Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />silt <br />SiMONS, Li & AssociATES, INC. <br /> <br />1660 SOUTH ALBION STREET <br />SUITE 1010 <br />DENVER, COLORADO 80222 <br /> <br />TELEPHONE (303) 692-0369 <br /> <br />November 4, 1986 <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Stanton <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />State Services Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />RE: Town of Ordway I.Iaster Drainage Pl anni ng Study (SLA Project <br />No. PCO.ORD.01l <br /> <br />Dear Bi 11 : <br /> <br />We have completed our analysis of the off-site drainage areas, adja- <br />cent to the Town of Ordway. Enclosed is a map depicting the location <br />of the design points, as well as a summary table of the peak flows for <br />the various methodologies used. <br /> <br />Three separate stonn patterns were applied in the Soil Conservation <br />Service (SCSl method, namely to 2-, 6- and 24-hour duration storms. <br />As can be seen from the table, peak flow variances of less than ten <br />percent are effected when applying the different storm patterns. With <br />respect to the basi ns under analy si s, I wou1 d reconmend that ei ther <br />the 2- or 6-hour pattern be used for the Ordway study. <br /> <br />The 10-year peak fl ow rates are extremely compatible between the <br />various methodologies. However, a wide variation of flow rates is <br />seen for the 100-year frequency, particularly for the northwest basin. <br />There is no clear explanation for the variances, other than that the <br />methods by their very nature are quite different in their application <br />and data base. <br /> <br />Within the context of this master drainage planning study, there is <br />some doubt as to whether there will be an economic basis for <br />justi fyi ng a 100-year design level, particul arly for the northwest <br />channel. It is becoming clear that if an 8,200 cubic feet per second <br />(cfsl design flow is used for planning, that substantial areas will be <br />shown in the floodplain. Even at 4,100 efs (as per the 2-hour SCS <br />calculations) the lack of channel capacity will result in a wide <br />100-year flood zone, probably not substantially deeper than the B,200 <br />efs case. However, in the case of a 4,100 efs flow rate this type of <br /> <br />Colorado Springs, CO . Fort Collins, CO <br />Newport Beach, CA . Phoenix, AZ . Tucson, AZ <br />