My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD09312
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD09312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:08:49 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:11:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
370
County
Crowley
Community
Ordway
Stream Name
Local Drainage
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Floodplain Study and Master Drainage Plan - Ordway, Colorado
Date
6/1/1987
Designation Date
7/1/1994
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />existing flow path. These facilities could daylight at the Town of Ordway <br />Ditch. <br />In the Central Basin, to fully conveyillll&'l!" flow to the existing box <br />culvert at City Park would require 30- through 72-inch storm sewers, extending <br />from the existing box, up Otero Avenue to 11th Street. Additionally, the <br />existing box culvert would need upgrading to a 7-foot by 7-foot structure. At <br />the outlet, of the new box, a grassl ined open channel with a top width of <br />50-feet woul d be requi red. The obvi ous expense of thi s system makes the <br />implementation of such a plan questionable. <br />The West Flow Path is not effected substanti ally by developed fl ows, <br />because the volume of storm flow originating from the Northwest Basin is <br />substantially greater than any developed flow from the Ordway West Property, <br />and the property immedi ately north of Ordway West. The only hi storic flow to <br />deal wi th woul d be that flow whi ch collects north of 11th Street, and moves <br />south along County Road 17. Si nce the right-of-way is not a problem, an open <br />channel could be used in place of a pipe system, and would have to extend from <br />the intersection of County Road 17 and 11th Street, south along Road 17 to 1st <br />Street, and then west to the historic outfall point for the Northwest Basin. <br />Figure 7 presents a conceptual layout of the improvements to convey deve- <br />loped condition flows along their historic flow paths. <br /> <br />Diversion <br />This alternative focuses on alleviating the existing and future flooding <br />probl em by di verti ng stonn flows away from areas whi ch are known to be flood <br />prone. This type of concept is a COlll11on alternative in areas where existing <br />flow paths have been blocked by development. The flooding which results is <br />usually shallow and of low velocity. In the case of Ordway, the existing <br />drainage facilities are inadequate to convey the developed storm flow, and <br />therefore, diverting the flow before it reaches these facil ities may be cost <br />effective. The major problem with the diversion concept is that the rerouted <br />storm flows must be controlled to a sufficient level whereby a new flooding <br />problem is not created. <br />Diversion of flows from historic paths is not practical in the Northeast <br />Basin, or areas tributary to the Town of Ordway Ditch. The lack of adequate <br />grades is the primary reason why diversion would be difficult to achieve. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />-~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.