FLOOD09102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'IIUIFelmm 3.7.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows.......................................................................................3-11 3.8 Public Services and Utilities.................................................................. 3-11 3.8.1 Alternative I - No Action ....................................................... 3-12 3.8.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action)..................................................... 3-12 3.8.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows......... ...... ..... ...... ............. ............. ..... ....... ..... .......... ........ 3-12 3.9 Hydrology / Water Quality.................................................................... 3-12 3.9.1 Alternative I - No Action ....................................................... 3-13 3.9.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action)..................................................... 3-13 3.9.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows. .......... ................. ........... .................... ..... ..... ........ .......... 3-14 3.10 Biological Resources .............................................................................3-14 3.10.1 Wetlands (E.G. 11990) ........................................................... 3-14 3.lO.1.1 3.10.1.2 3.10.1.3 Alternative I - No Action..................................... 3-15 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) ................ 3-15 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows................................................ 3-15 3.1 0.2 3.10.3 Threatened and Endangered Species ...................................... 3-16 Vegetation ...............................................................................3-17 3.1 0.3,1 3.lO.3.2 3.10.3.3 Alternative 1 - No Action ..................................... 3-17 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) ................ 3-17 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows .......................................,........ 3-17 3.10.4 Terrestrial Wildlife.................................................................. 3-18 3.10.4.1 3.10.4.2 3.lO.4.3 Alternative I - No Action ..................................... 3-18 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) ................ 3-18 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood Flows................................................ 3-18 3.11 Cultural Resources ................................................................................. 3-18 111