FLOOD09102

• County: Logan
• Community: Sterling
• Basin: South Patte
• Title: Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel Project
• Date: 4/1/2002
• Prepared For: Sterling
• Prepared By: URS
• Floodplain - Doc Type: Project

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.

TillE If clmm

3.3 Traffic and Circulation............................................................................. 3-6

3.3.1 Alternative 1 - No Action ......................................................... 3-6
3.3.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor
Channel (Proposed Action)....................................................... 3-6
3.3.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood

Flows........... ........... ............. .................. ...... .......... ..... ....... ........ 3-7

3.4 Public Health and Safety.......................................................................... 3-7

3.4.1 Alternative 1 - No Action ......................................................... 3-7
3.4.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor
Channel (Proposed Action) .......................................................3-7
3.4.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood

Flows ........................... ......................... .... .., .................. ............ 3-8

3.5 Socioeconomics .... ............ .,. ........ ... ............... ................... ........ ............... 3-8

3.5.1 Economic Issues........................................................................ 3-8

3.5.1.1
3.5.1.2

Alternative 1 - No Action ....................................... 3-8
Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control
Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) .................. 3-8
Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee
Creek Flood Flows.................................................. 3-9

3.5.1.3

3.5.2 Environmental Justice (E.O. 12898)......................................... 3-9

3.5.2.1
3.5.2.2

Alternative 1 - No Action....................................... 3-9
Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control
Interceptor Channel (proposed Action) .................. 3-9
Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee
Creek Flood Flows ................................................3-10

3.5.2.3

3.6 Air Quality ...............................................................,............................. 3-10

3.6.1 Alternative I - No Action ....................................................... 3-10
3.6.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor
Channel (Proposed Action)..................................................... 3-10
3.6.3 Alternative 3 - Improve Routing of Pawnee Creek Flood

Flows ........ ... ....................... ..................................................... 3-10

3.7 Noise ...................................................................................................... 3-10

3.7.1 Alternative 1 - No Action ....................................................... 3-11
3.7.2 Alternative 2 - Sterling Flood Control Interceptor
Channel (Proposed Action)..................................................... 3-11

11