Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />SEmO.THREE Affected Environments and Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />The EA focuses on those resources where impacts could occur. <br /> <br />3,1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> <br />Logan County is located in the high plains of northeastern Colorado near the center of the Great <br />Plains physiographic province. The greater part of the county is a dissected plain which has been <br />mantled with thin silty loess deposits, thick eolian sandy deposits, and locally reworked old <br />alluvial materials. The valley of the South Platte River varies in width from I to 4 miles. Nearly <br />level bottomlands and low terraces with fluctuating water tables are located adjacent to the river. <br />The well-drained higher terraces, mainly on the north side ofthe river, are some ofthe best- <br />irrigated soils in the area. Exhibit II shows the topography of the area. <br /> <br />The Soil Conservation Service (SCS), who now is the Natural Resources Conservation Service <br />(NRCS), conducted a detailed survey of soils in Logan County between 1965 and 1974 (SCS <br />1977). Eight soil mapping units (AIda loam, Fluvaquents, Haverson loam, Hayford silty clay <br />loam, Lebsack silty clay loam, Nunn clay loam, Satanta loam, and Nunn loam) are present within <br />the project area (SCS 1977). A brief description of each soil mapping unit is provided in <br />Appendix B. <br /> <br />With the exception of the Fluvaquent soil mapping units, all soil mapping units within the project <br />area are used extensively to produce irrigated crops (SCS 1977). The Fluvaquent soil mapping <br />units and small areas of the other mapping units are used for livestock grazing. Soils within the <br />project area have one or more characteristics which reduce their favorableness for the <br />construction of earthen embankments (SCS 1977). These undesirable characteristics include <br />seepage, piping, poor compaction, shrink-swell, and low strength. Each of these factors would <br />be evaluated in detail during the final engineering design of the project. Special design and/or <br />construction procedures would be implemented as needed. <br /> <br />3,1.1 Alternative 1 . No Action <br /> <br />The No Action Alternative would not affect geology and soils located in the project area since <br />this alternative does not include any restoration or improvement activities. However, soil <br />erosion could continue to occur during future flooding events. <br /> <br />3.1.2 Alternative 2. Sterling Flood Control Interceptor Channel (Proposed Action) <br /> <br />The channel construction activities associated with this alternative would not impact the geology <br />of the project area. Overall, approximately 60 acres of soil would be disturbed during vegetation <br />removal, grading, and channel construction. Of the disturbed soils, approximately 4 acres have <br />been previously disturbed by road or railroad development, 55 acres are currently used as <br />agricultural land, and approximately 1 acre along the South Platte River has riparian vegetation. <br />Disturbance of approximately 60 acres of soil does not represent a significant impact because <br />none of the affected soils are unique or have limited abundance in Logan County. In addition, <br />topsoil within the cropland areas would be stockpiled and spread back over the disturbed areas <br />after construction has been completed to allow grass to grow. To reduce soil erosion during <br />construction and to reduce the amount of silt entering the South Platte River, Best Management <br /> <br />3-1 <br />