My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08888
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:07:00 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:57:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Prowers
Community
Holly
Stream Name
Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Detailed Project Report - Public Law 87-874 Project
Date
3/1/1977
Prepared For
Prowers County
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />Economic Criteria <br /> <br />TIle economic criteria applied in formulating a plan were as <br />followA: <br /> <br />a. Tan!;ible benefits exceed project economic costs. <br /> <br />b. Each separable unit or purpose provide benefits at least <br />equal to its cos ts . <br /> <br />c. The scope of development is such as to provide the maximum <br />net benefits unless intangibles or other consideration dictate a project <br />which would foreeo some of the net benefits. <br /> <br />d. There is no more economical means, evaluated on a compar- <br />able basis, of accomplishing the Same purpose or purposes which would <br />be precluded from development if the plan were undertaken. This limi- <br />tation is only for alternatives that would be physically displaced or <br />economically precluded from development if the project were undertaken. <br /> <br />Benefits and costs are expressed in comparable quantitative eco- <br />nomic terms to the fullest extent possible. Costs of the alternatives <br />are based on price levels prevailing at the time of analysis with annual <br />costs based on a 50-yr. amortization and an interest rate of 6-3/8 <br />percent. <br /> <br />Environmentnl and Other Criteria <br /> <br />The following environmental criteria and intangibles were considered <br />in formulatine a plan: <br /> <br />a. Public health, safety and social well being, including <br />possible loss of life. <br /> <br />b. Avoidance, where possible, of detrimental environmental <br />effects and inclusion of feasible mitigating features for sucb effects <br />found unavoidable. <br /> <br />c. General public acceptance of possible plans through coor- <br />dination with interested Federal and non-Federal agencies, local groups <br />and individuals by means of cooperative efforts, public meetings and <br />other procedures. <br /> <br />1'()f;SIHLF SOWTIONS <br /> <br />Several "I ternuti vc protection and/or prl'vontiv(' mCllRurll8 for <br />providing flood protection for Holly and surrounding 8rellA are 1'08811> Ie. <br />1hese include: <br /> <br />a. Non-structural measures. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.