Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />TECHNIQUES OF WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />The system of vertical control corresponds <br />to what is sometimes described as "reciprocal <br />leveling." This method maintains balanced ele- <br />vations throughout the <lOurse of the survey in <br />moving from one transit setup to another. A <br />long sight and a short sight are taken from each <br />of two successive hubs (stakes over which transit <br />is set). The short sight consists of measuring <br />up from the hub to the level of the eyepiece of <br />the instrument, using either a level rod, an <br />engineer's folding rule, or a tape. The meas- <br />urement can 'be made within 0.01 foot and is <br />therefore equal in accuracy tJ other observa- <br />tions. The method of "reciprocal leveling" is <br />equivalent to making a "peg test" between each <br />of two successive hubs. The differences in <br />elevation obtaiued (when averaged) are there- <br />fore a eontinuous record of the error in adjust- <br />ment of the telescope level. If the differences <br />are plotted against the (doubled) distances be- <br />tween hubs and an average line drawn, the <br />elevation correction for any distance thus deter- <br />mined may be used to adjust the elevations on <br />side shots. If the error is over 0.03 foot per <br />100 feet, the instrument should be adjusted. <br />The field notes shown on figure 1 illustrate <br />the start of a survey using the prescribed method <br />of vertical control. The differences in the eleva- <br />tion of H.I.'s represent random, not instru- <br />mental, errors. Figure 2 is a replica of the same <br />set of notes, with an instrumental error of 0.03 <br />foot per 100 feet in the rod reading (rod read- <br />ings are too low). Note that despite the instru- <br />mental error, the elevations of the H.I.'s and of <br />the hubs used under each transit setup are <br />exactly the same as in the first set of figure 1. <br />The method of determining the corrections to <br />elevations is illustrated on figure 3. In the <br />notes, the H.I. determined from the preceding <br />hub is always entered first, then the H.I. com- <br />puted from the hub on which the instrument <br />is set. The second H.I. is subtracted from the <br />first, and the difference plotted against the sum <br />of the two distances read between the hubs, as on <br />figure 3. An average straight line is drawn <br />through the plotted points, starting from the <br />origin. [N OTE.- The line should go through <br />the origin unless a systematic error is being <br /> <br />made in measuring up from the hub.] Correc- <br />tions based on this line are applied to elevations <br />of only the side shots, using the algebraic sign <br />as determined from the correction curve. Note <br />that these balanced elevations agree with cor- <br />responding elevations of the notes of fignre 1. <br />Elevations of hubs, reference marks, and <br />high-water marks are read to hundredths of a <br />foot; elevations of cross sections are generally <br />read to tenths of a foot, except those of dam <br />crests, culverts, and paved highways, where <br />hundredths are used. Stadia readings with ver- <br />tical angles should not be used for determining <br />elevations, except in unusual cases for cross sec- <br />tions. If used, the adjustment of the vertical <br />circle should first be checked. <br />Where the rod held on high-water marks or <br />other features is above or below the horizontal <br />line of sight, or where a reading of the hori- <br />zontal crosshair is obstructed, time may be saved <br />with no appreciable loss of accuracy by use of <br />the "interval" or "stepping" method. Whole or <br />half stadia intervals may be used, for as many as <br />3 interva'ls. By holding the number of intervals <br />to a maximum of 3, the error from this source <br />will be a maximum of 0.002 foot vertically <br />per 100 feet of horizontal distance. The method <br />is usually limited to side shots, but with e,,'treme <br />care it may, if necessary, be used between hubs. <br />Where a small fall in water surface is in- <br />volved, every effort should be made to keep the <br />instrument in good adjustment and to adjust <br />the elevations of high-water marks. <br />If the area covered by the survey is small, and <br />all shots are made from one instrument setup, <br />no evidence of instrument error is available; a <br />peg test should then be made and shown in the <br />notes, or a peg test made on the same day should <br />be referred to. An alteruati ve would be to use <br />a minimum of two hubs on each survey, so that <br />the notes would automatically contain a test of <br />the instrument. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Peg test <br /> <br />Establish two points, A and B, near ground <br />level, 200-300 feet apart. The test may be run <br />between these points or stakes in either of two <br />ways. <br /> <br />. <br />