My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD08884
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
FLOOD08884
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:06:59 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:57:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the US Geological Survey General Field and Office Procedures for Indirect Dicharge Measurements
Date
1/1/1968
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GENERAL FIELD AND OFFICE PROCEDURES FOR INDIRECT DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS 3 <br /> <br />termination of the flow can be made. Every <br />site is a distinct hydraulic problem, and a <br />thorough knowledge of hydraulic principles is <br />essential to proper selection. Ideal conditions <br />for such determinations rarely exist, and judg- <br />ment must be used in choosing the most favor- <br />able of the possible sites by weighing advan- <br />tages and disadvantages of each. <br />It is possible sometimes to preselect indirect- <br />measurement sites for gaging stations. The <br />possible sites might differ depending upon the <br />flood stage. A listing of these sites on the field- <br />station description would keep this information <br />in the most easily accessible place. By such a <br />procedure vital time would be saved following <br />a major flood. Unless it is known th..t favorable <br />conditions for indirect measurement exist near <br />the gage, preliminary selection of sites can <br />usually be most easily made from either topo- <br />graphic maps or aerial photographs. <br />After preliminary selections have been made <br />from maps or aerial photographs, or if the avail- <br />able maps show no definite choice of sites, then <br />field reconnaissance is necessary for making the <br />selection. Under poor conditions, it may be <br />necessary to explore miles of river channel to <br />find a favorable reach. The final selection of <br />site should always be dependent on field in- <br />spection. <br />Where extensive flooding occurs, reconnais- <br />sance by air has been used to locate indirect- <br />measurement sites. As the terrain is viewed <br />from the air, likely sites and access routes may <br />be marked on a map. <br />It is important that no major tributaries enter <br />between the measuring site and the point at <br />which the discharge is desired. Minor tribu- <br />taries may carry negligible flow at the time of <br />the mainstream peak and thus not affect the <br />result. If the measuring site is at some distance <br />from the gaged point, then even with no ap- <br />preciable inflow there may be a significant <br />channel-storage correction. If the storm pro- <br />ducing the flood covers the basin, the peak may <br />increase in a downstream direction; if the storm <br />covers only the upstream part of the basin, the <br />peak may decrease in the main channel. Dis- <br />tance from the gaging point becomes more im- <br />portant for smaller drainage areas and for <br /> <br />sudden floods of short duration. Adj ustments <br />can be made, but unless detailed information of <br />the flood wave or inflow rate is recorded, the ad- <br />justments are necessarily arbitrary. Because <br />of these uncertainties, it is desirable to keep the <br />measuring site close to the point at which the <br />discharge is wanted, and it is sometimes prefer- <br />able to accept less favorable conditions at a site <br />nearer to the gage. <br /> <br />Field Survey <br /> <br />The field survey should be made with a high <br />degree of care, giving particular attention to <br />using all possible checks to avoid error. <br />Various instruments have been used for <br />making the field survey, but experience has <br />shown that an engineer's transit is best suited <br />for the job. It is recommended that a transit be <br />used to make a "transit-stadia" survey. This <br />method combines vertical and horizontal con- <br />trol surveys in one operation, is accurate, simple, <br />and speedy. <br />Surveys have been made by level-and-tape <br />and by planetable, but these are not recom- <br />mended. The first does not provide the exact <br />locations of high-water marks and channel <br />features that are necessary, and the second is <br />not suited for work in rough terrain, in high <br />wind, or in rain. Also, in anyone office indirect <br />measurements are made at infrequent intervals <br />and personnel cannot maintain expertness in all <br />types of instruments and surveys. As the <br />transit-st..dia method is believed best, only this <br />type is recommended. <br /> <br />Vertical control <br /> <br />If the measuring site is near a gaging station, <br />the survey datum shonld be gage datum, or <br />gage datum plus a convenient constant, such as <br />10.00,20.00 or 100.00 feet, to avoid possible neg- <br />ative elevations. Otherwise, an arbitrary ele- <br />vation may be assumed either for a reference <br />mark, the first hub, or the first H.J. If the sur- <br />vey datum is not gage datum, reference marks <br />of a permanent nature should be established to <br />permit recovery of the datum years later, if <br />necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.