Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Channel Variations, nz <br /> <br />Although the shape of a channel has little effect on roughness, changes <br />in the size of cross sections and side-to-side shifting of the low-water <br />channel in successive cross sections (also called channel alignment) will <br />increase hydraulic losses. Gradual changes in channel dimensions do not <br />increase turbulence; however, abrupt variations along the channel increase <br />turbulence and need to be evaluated. <br /> <br />Care needs to be taken not to reevaluate energy losses due to channel <br />variations when making hydraulic computations with available computer models. <br />Several models enable the user to calculate energy losses due to channel vari- <br />ations as a function of contraction or expansion coefficients and the varia- <br />tion of velocity head between successive cross sections. <br /> <br />Obstructions, n3 <br /> <br />Obstructions such as trees, stumps, large boulders, and debris deposits <br />increase roughness and cause backwater upstream and eddy losses downstream. <br />The degree of increased roughness can be evaluated in terms of reduction in <br />cross-sectional area, which depends on the type, size, shape, number, and <br />distribution of the obstructions. The effect of the obstruction increases <br />with velocity as the area of the disturbance surrounding the obstruction <br />increases and may overlap with nearby obstruction disturbances. Chow (1959) <br />did not define the adjustments; therefore, adjustments for the four degrees of <br />obstruction given in table 1 are based on guidelines provided by Aldridge and <br />Garrett (1973). <br /> <br />Free fall may result from the combined effect of several severe obstruc- <br />tions that act like a weir; under these conditions Manning's equation is <br />invalid. This problem can be avoided by the proper location of cross sections. <br /> <br />Channel Vegetation, n4 <br /> <br />The effect of bank vegetation is to increase turbulence and roughness and <br />reduce channel capacity. At three of the sites (fig. 11), as the depth of <br />flow in the main channel increased and encompassed bank vegetation, channel <br />roughness increased. This is particularly true for narrow channels. The <br />magnitude of this effect depends on the vegetation height related to depth of <br />flow, the capacity of the type of vegetation to resist bending, the amount of <br />vegetation that reduces channel capacity, and the time of year. Generally, <br />the effect of the vegetal cover on resistance is greater during the growing <br />season, which corresponds to the flood season in Colorado. During flood flows, <br />floating debris commonly lodges in the vegetation and increases roughness. <br /> <br />The criteria given in table 1 are based on the assumption that vegetation <br />is uniformly distributed in the channel. If the vegetation grows in bands or <br />is prevalent throughout a subarea in the reach, a composite n value needs to <br />be assigned to each subarea and weighted according to the size of the wetted <br />perimeter (eq. 3). <br /> <br />18 <br />