Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />the existing Barrier Dam. Municipal ities to be provided with supple- <br />mental w<:lter include Pueblo, Colorado Springs, and valley towns. along <br />the Arkansas River. The val ley towns, including Las Animas, wi II be <br />served by a trunk pipel ine about 130 mi les in length extending down- <br />stream from Pueblo Reservoir. In addition, the towns of Crowley, Eads, <br />and Wi ley wi II be served by branch pipel ines -total ing about 36 mi les <br />in length. Hydroelectric power wi I I be generated at seven power plants <br />located on the eastern slope. <br /> <br />36. The Pueblo Reservoir wi I I have a capacity of about 400,000 <br />acre-feet of which 93,000 acre-feet is allocated to flood control. The <br />Corps of Engineers wi I I have the responsibi lity of prescribing regula- <br />tions for the use of the flood control storage, as specified under <br />Section 7 of the 1944 Flood Control Act. About one-third of the <br />Arkansas River Basin above Las Animas wi I I be control led by the Pueblo <br />Dam; however, storms occurring over the large uncontrolled drainage <br />area be low the dam cou Id produce major f loodsat Las An imas. An impor- <br />tant effect of the project with respect to the flood problem at Las <br />Animas wi II be the reduction of flood peaks and frequency of overflow <br />frOm floods originating above Pueblo. It is estimated that if this <br />project had been in operation prior to the 1921 flood, the flood peak <br />of 187,000 c.f.s. at Las Animas would have been reduced to 108,000 <br />c. fos. <br /> <br />37. REMAINING WATER RESOURCES PROBLEMS AND NEEDS.- The existing <br />projects ~nd the authorized projects will make a significant contribu- <br />tion toward meeting the major water resources needs in the Arkansas <br />River Basin. The Trinidad Dam and Reservoir Project wi I I afford <:I <br />high degree of protection to Trinidad and vicini~y from floods on the <br />Purgatoire River, and optimum regulation of river flows for irrigation. <br />In addition, it wi II provide a much-needed recreational faci I ity. The <br />Fryingpan~Arkansas Project wi I I bring additional water into the basin <br />to alleviate irrigation shortages; make more water avai labl@ for mu- <br />nicipal and industrial purposes at Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Las Animas, <br />and other towns; provide hydroelectric power and recreational oppor- <br />tunities; and reduce flooding on the main stem of the Arkan~as River <br />between pueblo and, John Martin Dam. <br /> <br />38. Nevertheless, there wil I be many unsolved problem~, even after <br />completion of the authorized projects. Although Pueblo Dam wi I I reduce <br />flooding on the main stem from Pueblo to John Martin Dam, the uncon- <br />trolled tributary inflow below the dam will cause flood problems at <br />La Junta and Las Animas, and throughout much of the agricultural area. <br />There wi I I be main stem flood problems al~o at Florence, Portland, and <br />other local ities above the Pueblo dam site. Flood problems known to <br />ex i st from tr ibutary streams that wou I d not be affected by the .author i zed <br />projects include Coal Creek at Florence, Dry Creek and Fountain Creek at <br />Pueblo, Fountain Creek at Colorado Springs, King and Anderson Arroyos <br />at La Junta, Huerfano River atWalsenburg, and Wolf Creek at Granada. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />