Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The proposed evaluation plan is presented in Section 10; and operation, maintenance, <br />repair, and rehabilitation considerations and responsibilities are discussed in Section II. A <br />detailed cost estimate of all project features, including construction, operation, maintenance, <br />repair and rehabilitation, and monitoring, is presented in Section 12, Real estate requirements <br />or easements to construct the project on land owned by the Corps are discussed in Section 13. <br />A tentative schedule for planning, design, construction, and completion of the selected plan is <br />shown in Section 14. Section 15 describes implementation responsibilities and coordination. <br />Public and agency coordination are discussed in Section 16. Conclusions and recommendations <br />are summarized in Section 17, Sections 18 and 19 provide a list of the DPR preparers and a <br />draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), respectively. An evaluation in accordance with <br />EP A's Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material (40 CFR 230) <br />is contained in Section 20. Section 21 provides literature cited. Attached to the DPR are <br />technical appendices, which include detailed design and cost studies. Appendices are included <br />in a separate volume (Volumes 2), <br /> <br />2. SITE SELECTION PROCESS <br /> <br />il <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />a. General Eligibility Criteria: The Reaffirmation Report (U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers, 1990) describes the various aspects of the mitigation project, including the general <br />criteria to be used in selection of non-public sites for acquisition and development. These <br />criteria are as follows: (1) sites in private ownership will be acquired on a willing seller basis <br />to the extent possible; (2) sites will generally have a minimum size of 100 acres; (3) the total <br />acreage acquired and/or developed in each State will be approximately 28,950 acres in Missouri, <br />9,600 acres in Iowa, 7,200 acres in Nebraska, and 2,350 acres in Kansas; (4) areas selected <br />must be compatible with the authorized purposes of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and <br />Navigation Project and will have no adverse effects on navigation, on the carrying capacity of <br />the existing levee systems, or on the flood-carrying capacity of the existing floodway; (5) <br />emphasis is to be given to acquiring remaining larger contiguous tracts of bottomland timber, <br />wetlands or former wetlands that can be restored, areas suitable for development of terrestrial <br />forest and grassland, and areas where chutes and backwaters can be restored; (6) acquisition of <br />agricultural land should be limited, except where the area has high potential for development or <br />where a willing seller is available; (7) acquisition will be confined to the meander belt; (8) sites <br />for chute and backwater restoration will undergo an engineering, economic, and environmental <br />feasibility determination; (9) public access to areas will not be a determining factor in <br />acquisition; (10) sites chosen for chute, backwater, or wetlands restoration will include enough <br />adjacent land to allow establishment of perimeter habitats; (11) sites chosen for acquisition <br />and/or development will be based upon State and Federal agency input and support; and (12) <br />estimated operation and maintenance costs will also be considered, <br /> <br />In addition to those criteria, the States provided an initial screening and prioritization of <br />their recommended acquisition and development sites, The Kansas City (CEMRK) and Omaha <br />(CEMRO) Districts evaluated the engineering feasibility of developing certain State-owned lands <br />and ranked the sites according to potential success or failure. Therefore, proposed projects are <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />II <br />