Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SECTION TWO <br /> <br />Existing Conditions 01 Stormwater Management <br /> <br />2.2 OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Stormw;1tcr management includes addre~sing problems and potential problem!'. at r-oth local and <br />regional levels. At the local level. smaller drainage areas such as .;;ubdivi..;ions require <br />conveyance and/or delcntion to prevent property damage. nuisance !looding. pollutant loading. <br />and mher lloading problel1l~ bOlh within and down...tream of the dew'lopmcnt. .-\1 a regional <br />level. these local development-. are all tribulary to larger drain... and washes. which transcend <br />municipal boundaries. Planning must be coordinawd between local entities for regional <br />structures that may be required. For example. a regional delention pond may be the best solution <br />to dl'tain flows from multiple jurisdictions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Table I is a ~ull1mary of the "big picture" of <br />..,tormw3tcf operations in the Grand Valley. <br />Table I illU'.arales that Ino...t actIvities are <br />sati...faclorily compleled by a majority of the <br />: -. entities within their own juri~diction",. <br />I lowcvcr. multi-jurisdictional (regional) <br />projects arc only compleled to a limited extent <br />" by ~lcsa County and the District and are not <br />completed at all by Grand Junction. Fruita. and <br />Pali..ade. These significant gap_" in regional <br />service... are lIne of the primary rea...ons for this <br />study. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />~";':,eitl~-! <br />'-, (r~~ <br />';-f:~~ - ~ . <br />.". .... ""_...' 'J <br />., - -.....1.... <br />..' " <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />".-'~" ':';'':-;j <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />...ij'r'" <br />- .'1 <br /> <br />,. <br />l '.":'"., ~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ligrani Drain - Typinlf Opnl {Jraill <br />.\lditl/t'lWIlCt' Aail'fries <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Tahle I <br />Exi\ling Operations ofthl' Fht" EntHi...!'> <br />(Adl'lIU;lt.')' (If Curn'ot I)rograms 10 Pl'rform Acti\'ilit'sl <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> Juri!>dktion <br /> C;rand <br />.\cli, il~ \It"'ll Count~ Grand Fruila Jlllli!>adl' Junction <br /> Junction Oraina~I' <br /> Oi!>tricl <br />Inol\lou<11 Juri!>Jl.:tLOn ~lo~1 YL'~ Ye~ ~I(>~t Ye" <br />~tulli-Juri"di':llOnal iRegl<lnal- Lllnllt.'J ;\" ;\,1 :\,p I LmHlt.'d <br />thwuc:h<lut ,Iud\ ate;!) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table I wa~ ron,lnlcted with ...ignificantl~ more detail than ~ho\\ n in the ,ununar~ presented <br />abo\t~. The detailed analysi~ included four major group~ of acti\'ilie~ with a number of sub- <br />aCli\llie~ under each ('If the four groups. The four major aCli\-it~ group" are listed J:ldow: <br /> <br />. Capital tmpron:ment planning and constnLctJon j9 subgroup actl\-itie"l, <br /> <br />. Operation and maintenanl,.'e 19 <o;uJ:lgroup actl\'itie~l. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />. ""'O!E':~s.n~;;.ocr. .G".~...:::..~i._E'f SwS.OC't;O_""o... _CE~V.~I"'''- "Eo>O"-;....A.. "EP' "i:\.' ~ :>OCl".Iu~.{iJ. 2-l <br />