My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07833
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:14:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
This Number is a Duplicate
USE #2378
Community
USE #2378
Stream Name
Duplicate Entry
Basin
South Platte
Title
USE Floodplain Document #2378
Date
7/15/1982
Prepared For
Larimer County
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1. For a breach width of 25 feet, the peak discharge would have been <br />7,000 cubic feet per second less downstream from Lawn Lake dam to 1,300 cubic <br />feet per second less at Estes Park. Maximum flood depths would have averaged <br />0.6 foot lower; the flood wave would have reached Estes Park at the same time. <br />For this hypothetical case, Cascade lake dam still would have failed. <br />2. For a breach width of 200 feet, peak discharge would have been 22,600 <br />cubic feet per second greater downstream from Lawn lake dam to 5,400 cubic <br />feet per second greater at Estes Park. Maximum flood depth would have aver- <br />aged 2.7 feet higher; the flood wave would have reached Estes Park 0.4 hour <br />ear 1 i er. The mode 1 a 1 so i ndi cated that the outflow peak di scharge from the <br />worst-case failure of lawn Lake dam could have been at least 56,000 cubic feet <br />per second. <br /> <br />If Cascade lake dam had not failed (or had not been present), peak <br />discharges would have been reduced by 11,300 cubic feet per second immediately <br />downstream from the dam to 500 cubi c feet per second 1 ess at Estes Park. <br />Maximum flood depths would have averaged 0.6 foot lower, and the flood wave <br />would have reached Lake Estes 0.3 hour later. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Just before sunrise, at about 0530 MDT (Mountain Daylight Time), on the <br />calm, clear morning of Thursday, July 15, 1982, the privately-owned Lawn Lake <br />dam, a 26-ft-high earthen structure, located at an elevation of about 11,000 <br />ft in Rocky Mountain National Park, breached due to a piping failure (Office <br />of the State Engineer, 1983), releasing 674 acre-ft and an estimated peak <br />discharge of 18,000 ft3/s of water down the Roaring River (fig. 1). <br /> <br />"I started to hear a sound like an airplane. Also, there were loud <br />booms. It got louder and louder. I thought it was breaking the <br />sound barrier. I kept looking for a plane, but couldn't see one. <br />I got suspicious and started to look upstream. I saw trees crashing <br />over and a wall of water coming down. I started to run as fast as I <br />could for high ground. There was a deafening roar. I fell and got <br />up and kept running. I stood on high ground and watched it wipe <br />out our campsite. It knocked everything in its path over; Steve <br />didn't stand a chance." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />With these words Steven Cashman described his harrowing experience with <br />the flood that swept his camping companion to his death in the Roaring River. <br />Other campers along the Roaring River estimated the wall of water to be 25 to <br />30 ft high, carrying with it large trees and boulders, 50 that the water <br />looked 1 i ke a "wet, brown cloud" and sounded 1 i ke extreme ly loud continuous <br />"thunder" or a "freight train." <br /> <br />The flood, attenuated by the relatively flat Horseshoe Park (an old <br />glacial lakebed), continued along the Fall River, where it caused Cascade lake <br />dam (an approximately 12-ft-high, 12-acre-ft concrete gravity dam) to fail <br />because of tipping over from overtopping. Peak discharge upstream from <br />Cascade lake dam was 7,210 ft3/s; however, discharge increased to 16,100 ft3/s <br />or more as a result of the Cascade Lake dam failure. The flood continued to <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.