My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07833
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:14:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
This Number is a Duplicate
USE #2378
Community
USE #2378
Stream Name
Duplicate Entry
Basin
South Platte
Title
USE Floodplain Document #2378
Date
7/15/1982
Prepared For
Larimer County
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />velocities ranged from 3.3 to 12.6 feet per second. Traveltimes of the flood <br />were determined from eyewitness accounts. The leading flood wave took 3.28 <br />hours to travel 12.5 miles (average 3.8 miles per hour). Flood peaks were 2.1 <br />to 30 times the 500-year flood for selected locations along the flood path. <br />Geomorphic and sedimentologic evidence suggest that it probably was the <br />largest flood in these basins, at least since the retreat of the glaciers <br />several thousands of years ago. <br /> <br />Geomorphic effects of the flood resulting from the dam failures were <br />profound. Channe 15 were wi dened tens of feet and scoured from 5 to 50 feet <br />1 oca lly. In the Roari ng Ri ver vall ey, alternate river reaches were ei ther <br />scoured or filled, depending on valley slope. Generally, reaches steeper than <br />7 percent were scoured, and reaches less than 7 percent were filled. In the <br />Roari ng Ri ver, 56 percent of the channe 1 was scoured, some by as much as <br />50 feet, and 44 percent was filled with coarse sediments, 2 to 8 feet thick. <br /> <br />An alluvial fan of 42.3 acres, containing 364,600 cubic yards of materi- <br />al, was deposited at the mouth of the Roaring River. The fan has a maximum <br />thickness of 44 feet and an average thickness of 5.3 feet. The largest <br />boulder known to have moved in the flood, 14x17.5x21 feet and weighing an <br />est imated 452 tons, was located on the all uvi a 1 fan. Down the fl ow axi s, <br />average particle size changes from 7.5-foot boulders to fine sand and silt in <br />a distance of 1,900 feet. The alluvial fan dammed the Fall River, forming a <br />lake of 17 acres upstream from the fan. <br /> <br />Satisfactory results were obtained from the dam-break model, but not <br />without significant difficulties in proper operation of the model. To cali- <br />brate the model, Manning n-values between 0.1 and 0.2, or an average of 78 <br />percent greater than fi e 1 d- se 1 ected values, were requi red; subcri t i ca 1 fl ow <br />was verified. The occurrence of numerous debris dams caused localized <br />backwater, resulting in predominantly subcritical flow. However, when these <br />debris dams broke, flow probably was supercritical for a short distance until <br />another debris dam formed. Without the extensive calibration of the model and <br />the assumption of subcritical flow, results would have been significantly <br />different. <br /> <br />Peak di scharges from dam-break model i ng refl ect water-only di scharges; <br />total discharge may have been considerably higher on the Roaring River and on <br />the Fall River immediately downstream from Cascade Lake dam from sediment and <br />debris. At Horseshoe Falls and for a short reach downstream from Cascade Lake <br />dam, geomorphic and sedimentologic evidence indicates the flow temporarily <br />became a debris torrent, or a coarse-grained, organic, and water-rich type of <br />debri s flow. The sediment and debri s may have bul ked the peak water flow by <br />50 to 60 percent. The range of difference of observed and modeled peak <br />discharges varied from -3,200 cubic feet per second to 600 cubic feet per <br />second. The range of difference of observed and modeled maximum flood depth <br />was -1. 3 to 2.6 feet and averaged 1. 0 foot. The range of difference of <br />observed and modeled leading edge of traveltime was -0.4 and 0.15 hour. <br /> <br />Comparisons were made for hypothetical breach widths of (1) 25 feet and <br />(2) 200 feet. They were compared with model results of the actual breach <br />width of 55 feet: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.