My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07729
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:12:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:10:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Consulting Services for Flood Documentation 1999 Presidential Disaster Declaration (SOQ)
Date
6/14/1999
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />much as 13 inches of rain were reported, This was a large, general storm event that impacted <br />a large area, Significant flood damage occurred along the Arkansas River, particularly in La <br />Junta. Portions of La Junta and surrounding communities were inundated from partial failure <br />of levies constructed by the COE. Additional damage resulted from back.up of sanitary <br />sewers into residential neighborhoods and damage to roads, bridges and agricultural lands, 1\ <br />was reported that flooding on the river was roughly a 20,to 30"year event <br /> <br />Damage in the Colorado Springs area included overtopping of culverts, and loss of roadways <br />due to erosion damage, Fountain Creek experienced peak flows estimated to be 26,000 cfs <br />(roughly a la-year flow), which created damage from the City of Fountain nearly to Pueblo, <br /> <br />Approach: Once the ICON Engineering team has been selected, but before we are under <br />contract, we anticipate that a first, very significant task will be to sit down with the CWCB <br />team to fully discuss the expected scope of services, and to preview documentation that has <br />already been accumulated by the CWCB. Critical to completing the report will be making <br />sure that full use of available material is made, and the CWCB is likely in the best position to <br />evaluate, and inform the selected consultant, of the whereabouts, and validity of data, Once <br />this initial "scoping" meeting has been conducted, we will write a definitive scope of services, <br />along with a detailed fee estimate which will serve as the basis of the contract. We have a <br />very successful record of quick turn-around time in producing the detailed scopes. For <br />purposes of this submittal, it would be reasonable to aSSlillle that once notified of our <br />selection, and once we conduct the scoping meeting, that we would be able to produce the <br />final negotiated scope of services along with fees within a one week time frame" <br /> <br />A detailed scope of services was furnishcd to the consultants as a part of the Request For <br />Qualifications, (Draft Scope of Work dated May 20, 1999), The first defined task on Page 2 <br />under Obiective is to meet with the CWCB staff to obtain existing flood documentation <br />already available, We are suggesting that this meeting be held prior to finalizing the contract, <br />so that a better understanding of the magnitude of available material can be achieved, We <br />further suggest that the meeting include personnel from the USGS. <br /> <br />Report Approach: As discussed above, we anticipate that the initial fact finding and data <br />gathering will occur as a part of the scope of work negotiation, We assunle that one of the <br />significant sources of data will include information developed by the USGS. Many of the <br />counties to be studied were also damaged from the previously documented Hoods of 1997, <br />Contacts developed as a part of that study are documented in the footnotes to the report and <br />will be further contacted as a part of the 1999 work, <br /> <br />As a part of our previous work, ICON Engineering had the opportunity to meet with Fred <br />Sibley from the Colorado Office of Emergency Management Mr. Sibley's office will be the a <br />major source of information, If at all possible, it would be advantageous to have a <br />representative from the Office of Emergency Management attend the initial scoping meeting, <br />Regardless of that, we anticipate that illl extended meeting with Mr. Sibley at his office will <br />yield much data not available anywhere else, <br /> <br />We will carefully log and document all data received from tbe CWCB and Mr. Sibley to <br />implement a system of data management It will be very important that we know what we got <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.