My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07584
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:12:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:05:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
486
County
Larimer
Community
Wellington
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Wellington, CO, Larimer County
Date
10/1/1998
Designation Date
3/1/1999
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />conditions existing in the community <br />study. Maps and flood elevations <br />reflect future changes. <br /> <br />at the time of completion of this <br />will be amended periodically to <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by <br />detailed methods affecting the communLty. <br /> <br />For the original study the SCS performed the hydrologic analyses of <br />Coal Creek and Boxelder Creek while compiling their Watershed Work <br />Plan (Reference 4). Precipitation values were taken from U.S. <br />Weather Bureau Technical Papers 40 and 49 (References 6 and 7, <br />respectively). Soil information was taken from the unpublished <br />detail soil survey completed by the SCS for Larimer County <br />(Reference 8). The SCS Program for Project Formulation, Hydrology <br />wa5 used to develop and route hydrographs (Reference 9). <br /> <br />At the time the original Flood Insurance Study was completed, only <br />two of the three reservoirs above Wellington had been constructed; <br />therefore, based on the information supplied by the SCS, the <br />storage for the third reservoir,. B-2, was not considered in the <br />discharge computation. <br /> <br />The discharges used for Coal Creek are based on <br />conditions. The unregulated discharges have been <br />account for the ",at er '~hich ",'i! 1 be intercepted by <br />Ditch, Located near the northern co~?or9.te L i:rni t s of <br />The Windsor Ditch diverts the 10-year flood; therefore, <br />shown for the 10-year flood in this report. <br /> <br />pre-projec: <br />reduced :'0 <br />the Windsor <br />Wellington. <br />no data are <br /> <br />Hydrologic data used for the restudy of Boxelder Creek were <br />provided to the SCS by the CWCB. The original source of the <br />discharge-frequency values was the Simons ~ Li, & Associates, Inc.. <br />study "Cooper Slough, Boxelder Creek Master Drainageway Planning <br />Study - 1981" {Reference 2). The data were reviewed and concurred <br />in by the CWCB and the SCS. The methodology Ior developing the <br />discharge data was the "Storm Water Management Model" (SWMM), as <br />developed by the Environmental Protection Agency, and revised by <br />the Missouri River Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), <br />1973 (Reference 10). <br /> <br />Hydrologic data were based on conditions that reflected final <br />completion of the BoxeLder Creek Watershed project. A general <br />assumption in the hydrologic data is that irrigation ditches and <br />canals that cross the basin do not intercept flood waters from the <br />drainages they cr05s. The logic behind this assumption is that the <br />ditches and canaLs come into the basin full from upstream runoff <br />and; therefore, have no capacity to intercept additional runoff. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage a-rea -relationships for Boxelder Creek and <br />Coal Creek are shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.