Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for, and magnitude of, losses of <br />freeboard that may result from <br />settlement of the levee and that <br />demonstrates that the minimum <br />required freeboard will be <br />maintained <br /> <br />7. Interior Drainage -- An engineering <br />analysis of the potential hazards <br />associated with floodwaters that <br />originate on the landward side of <br />the levee <br /> <br />8. Operations A formal levee <br />operation plan <br /> <br />9. Maintenance A formal levee <br />maintenance plan <br /> <br />Occasionally, exceptions to the minimum <br />freeboard requirements cited in Items 1 <br />and 2 for riverine and coastal levees may <br />be approved. Any request for an <br />exception must be supported by <br />appropriate engineering analyses which <br />show that, even with the lesser <br />freeboard, a high level of certainty for <br />100-year flood protection exists. <br /> <br />For riverine levees, the supporting <br />analyses must evaluate the uncertainty <br />in the estimated BFE and must assess, at <br />a minimum, the statistical confidence <br />limits of the 100-year peak discharge; <br />stage-discharge relationshi ps for floods <br />larger than the 100-year flood; and the <br />sources, potential, and magnitude of <br />debris, sediment, and ice accumulation <br />that may affect those relationshi ps. The <br />analyses must also show that the levee <br />will remain structurally stable during the <br />base flood, when such additional <br />loading conditions are imposed. <br />Freeboards of less than 2 feet will not be <br />accepted. <br /> <br />For coastal levees, the supporting <br />analyses must evaluate the uncertainty <br />in the estimated base flood loading <br />conditions. particular emphasis must be <br />placed on the effects of wave attack and <br />overtopping on the stability of the levee. <br />Freeboards of less than 2 feet above the <br />computed stillwater surge elevation will <br />not be accepted. <br /> <br />In lieu of the data described in Items 1 <br />through 6 above, the requestor may <br />submit a certification by a Federal <br />agency with the responsibility for levee <br />design that the levee has been <br />adequately designed and constructed to <br />provide 1 GO-year flood protection. <br />Although a Federal agency certification <br />may be submitted in lieu of Items 1 <br />through 6, it will not satisfy the <br />requirement for an interior drainage <br />analysis (Item 7). Therefore, if a Federal <br />agency certification is submitted it must <br />be accompanied by one of the <br />following: <br /> <br />1. An additional certification -- also by <br />a Federal agency with the <br />responsibility for levee-design -- that <br />either states that no 100-year flood <br />hazard associated with interior <br />drainage exists in the protected area <br />or identifies areas subject to 100- <br />year flooding caused by inadequate <br />interior drainage. <br /> <br />2. A complete interior drainage <br />analysis as described in Item 7. <br /> <br />In addition, a certification by a <br />Federal agency does not waive the <br />requirement for the levee <br />operations and maintenance plans <br />(Items 8 and 9). <br /> <br />Map Revision Procedures <br /> <br />In its review of a Map Revision request, FEMA <br />will communicate by letter and, as necessary, by <br />telephone directly with the person who <br />submitted the request. If that person is a private <br />party, copies of all letters to that person from <br />FEMA wi II be sentto the CEO. <br /> <br />After a revision request has been received from <br />the CEO or from a private party, FEMA will <br />perform a preliminary review of the request and <br />the supporting data submitted with it. The <br />purpose of the preliminary review is to <br />determine whether at least the basic supporting <br />data required for a Map Revision have been <br />provided and, if the request was submitted to <br /> <br />27 <br />