My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07447
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
FLOOD07447
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:48 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:00:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Proposed Distribution List Flood Hazrd Mitigation List
Date
1/1/1983
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3,1,1 Aging Dams <br /> <br />The increasing age of many dams in Colorado is becoming a <br />major problem, Many dams were built around the turn of the <br />century to capture surplus streamflow during snowmelt runoff, <br />This water is used to supplement irrigation water requirements in <br />the late summer for ditch systems with junior direct flow water <br />rights, As a result, these dams are in need of additional main- <br />tenance and repairs as the aging and erosion forces continue to <br />wear on a dam and its related appurtenances, <br /> <br />The State Engineer's list of certain dams in need of <br />rehabilitation was made available to the CWCB late in 1981. The <br />dams on this list were those capable of storing water on streams <br />with interstate compacts where Colorado was not using its full <br />entitlement or where additional storage was needed. In the last <br />two years, 26 projects were authorized for construction under the <br />CWCB construction fund program, 20 in Senate Bill 439 (1981), and <br />6 in Senate Bill 87 (1982). <br /> <br />From the 20 projects on SB 439, two involved new dam con- <br />struction at a State cost of $400,000; one involved repair of a <br />dam not included on the State Engineer's list at a State cost of <br />$112,000 <br /> <br />From the six projects on SB 87, two involved new dam con- <br />struction at a State cost of $4,795,000; two involved repairs of <br />dams not included on the State Engineer's list at a State cost of <br />$2,182,000; and the Rio Grande Reservoir was on the State Engi- <br />neer's list (State cost was $1,134,500--out of which $619,500 is <br />non~reimbursable). <br /> <br />A letter was sent to 27 of the 34 project owners on the <br />State Engineer's list (because the CWCB was already working with <br />4 owners and the State owned the other 3 dams) informing them <br />about the CWCB program. Some telephone inquiries were made and <br />three written responses were received to the letter, but no <br />project application form was submitted to the CWCB for a project. <br /> <br />From the responses received to the CWCB program, it is <br />apparent that owners of dams in need of rehabilitation have the <br />following difficulties: <br /> <br />(1) They cannot afford the matching funds required, which <br />in most cases may have to be borrowed at interest rates <br />that often may exceed 15%; <br /> <br />(2) Members of entities are reluctant to contribute more <br />for their water project and think that a grant program <br />through the State or Federal governments should be <br />available; and <br /> <br />(3) In general, where water is used for strictly agricul- <br />tural purposes, an entity cannot afford to pay for a <br />rehabilitated project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.