My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD07356
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD07356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:11:33 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:55:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Alamosa
Community
Alamosa County
Stream Name
Rio Grande River
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Comments for Phase I Preliminary Design of Rio Grande Levee System
Date
5/6/1986
Prepared For
Alamosa County
Prepared By
Muller Engineering Company, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7. Cross Sections need to show all proposed dimensions. Need to indicate <br />foundation soil type, and differentiate between the embankment "sUty sand" <br />and the "silty sand" at the landside toe of the levee (i. e., random fill and <br />pervious fill, respectively). <br /> <br />8. The maximum height of levee is shown as 10 feet, but the dimension or <br />control for the height/size of zone 2 is not given. What dimensions were used <br />to analyze for slope stability? In addition to end of construction and steady <br />state seepage analyses, both sudden drawdown (Min. FS-1.0) and critical flood <br />stage (Min. FS-1.4) conditions should be analyzed. The maximum height on the <br />riverside is given as 12 feet (not 10 feet as shown in Fig 2), but the height <br />of the landside levee portion is not shown. Density values for all three <br />material types are the same - there should be Some variation. Likewise, <br />cohesion values for the three materials are questionable. A cohesion value of <br />zero should be assumed for the silty to clean sand and natural gravelly sand. <br />Friction angle values should vary somewhat for the three material types (i.e., <br />28 - 30 degrees for silty sand, 30 degrees for silty to clean sand and 34 <br />degrees for natural gravelly sand). <br /> <br />9. The geo-technical investigation incates that the materials should be <br />placed at moisture contents between plus or minus 3% of optimum. It is <br />recommended that moisture contents between 2% of optimum be utilized. <br />However, a statement should be included that acceptable moisture content <br />values are ultimately dependent upon the moisture-density relationship <br />developed in the laboratory based on standard proctor results. <br /> <br />]0. It is recommended that the landside third of the storm sewers placed <br />under the embankment, be backfilled with filter material (ie. processed <br />material) around the pipe as a defense measure against piping. <br /> <br />11. It is recommended if possible, that the riprap be extended to the top of <br />the levee (see Section F-F). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.