Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~ <br />j <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"'- <br /> <br />7"6 <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING '94 <br /> <br />Table I, Radio-b'aCked sediment particle parameterS and navel distances. <br /> Final Fmal Travel Tune Travel <br />Rock II B~axis Volume Mass SpGr Distance Duration Ve\ocily <br /> (mm) (mI) (g) (10) (min) (mImin) <br />10 72 204 502 2.46 732 180 4,1 <br />12 76 213 547 2.57 1065 270 3,9 <br />13 84 242 593 2.45 m 200 . 5,0 <br />14 71 232 601 2,59 686 170 4,0 <br />15 80 235 602 2.56 796 185 4,3 <br />16 76 278 718 2.58 713 175 4.1 <br />17 86 303 728 2.40 347 215 1.6 <br />18 82 299 763 2,55 357 125 2,9 <br />19 77 312 803 2.57 562 160 3,5 <br /> <br />signal to indicate whether the particle is at test or in motion, These particles, rocks 12 <br />and 17, tefem:d to as the momtored rocks, were monitored continuously and the <br />duration of the test and motion periods wete recorded, The motion sensors used in <br />this study were built with a delay of 5 s, with the tesult that only test periods <br />exceeding 5 s were detected, Motion periods of less than 5 s were detected if foUOW<<! <br />by a detectable test period. Motion periods of 1 s or more were used in the analysis. <br /> <br />The radio. implanted rocks were placed in the stream at mid-channel. The initial <br />motion period of the monitored rocks was not included in the analysis; however, after <br />the first movement they were assumed to have become part of the natural movable boI. <br /> <br />Shvly Site <br /> <br />Phelan Creek is a glacier-fed river located on the north side of the Alaskan Rang' <br />in Interior Alaska, The study site was located approximately 1.6 Ian downstream of <br />the tenninus of Gulkana Glacier, at an elevation of 1125 m. The drainage area is 31 <br />lan2, of which 70% is glaciated, This study was conducted on 17 August 1990 at a <br />discharge of 16 m3s- J, near the annual peak, Continuous monitoring lasted about 2 <br />hr, while sediment b'aCking lasted about 4 hr, The entire tracking period took place OIl <br />the rising limb of the diurnal hydrograph. About midway through the monitoring <br />period, mean velocity for the stream cross section was 1.93 10 s-1 with a maximwn <br />mean (in a venical) velocity of 2,82 10 s-I at a total depth of 0.73 10, <br /> <br />The study reach was about 1000 10 in length with an average gradient ofO.OS <br />milO, The size of the tracked rocks (b-axis diameter hetween 66 and 86 mm, Tabk <br />I), falls hetween the D50 and D65 of the bed material as determined by the pebble <br />count method (Wolman, 1954) on a shon reach within the study reach. At the time of <br />the study, the stream was capable of easily transporting material in this size range; in <br />fact, much larger material was in transpon, as evidenced by the sound of boulders <br />frequently heard roUing in the stream. The data collected in this study are intended 10 <br />show the characteristics of movemeDl of coarse bedload in the size range well below <br />the maximum size the stream is capable of transporting, <br /> <br />&mIu <br /> <br />Describing sediment transpon as a setics of motion and rest periods of the <br />individual sediment particles was proposed by Einstein (1950), Ergenzinger and <br /> <br />..- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />787 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />MONITORING GRAVEL MOVEMENT <br /> <br />Schmidt (1990), using a radio tracking tecbuique, made the fim Ii ld <br />''''p length, distance lraveled during the motion period, and n: t e.od ~ts of <br />lhi, study, we utilized the motion sensor installed with the ~ pen , 1II1ll1on, In <br />measure 18 and 29 pairs of motion and rest ' ods ~ th tran~tters to <br />IINo-hour monitoring period. The length of:tion or, e two mOllltored rocks over a <br />bolh rocks, although most were less tlUIO 20 s In =ods ran14 fium 110 190 s for <br />periuds :o'ere variable and a single, long resl ~ acco:;.~ ~ e engthhalfs of n:sl <br />monllonng bme The actual pen:enta f . or over the IOtal <br />forrockl7 and i7,1% for rack 12 ,eodis~ll1ebuthl1O,enrockof s W~lnand' motion Was 4,3% <br />L..' era! th .. ' u, motJon resl periods 'ed <br />~I, In gen ,e majortly of the motion periods OCC'_.' di' , van <br />,^" IS ted by , ~'OU 10 SbllCl epIsodes of <br />n~on even . sel"l1'!' relaovely long rest periods (Fi I) Abou ' <br />lhe total Orne 10 mooon of rock 17 OCCIIITed in one ' g, 'sode,' ! two-thirds of <br />movement o( rock 12 occlllTed in four distinct e ' monoo epl while the. <br />vanable length (Fig, 1), These data suggesl truJ'~:gr~condiby ~st periodlha s of <br />easoly transpun the material size once the rocks ' , v), twns t could <br />10 motion (or e,reoded Il1Otion ePisodes, were pUI m monon they tended to stay <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />1400 <br /> <br />Rock '17 <br /> <br />- <br />':"J200- <br />is 1000 <br />~ OlD <br />~ooo <br /> <br />~: <br /> <br />I ( <br />.I <br /> <br />Roct 112 <br /> <br />''''' <br />L~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />......... <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />........ <br /> <br /> <br />2000 4000 C5000 1000 0 0 <br />TOTAL SAMPLING 11MB (s) ~ 4000 6000 aooo <br />F' ,v,ALSAMPUNG 11MI!~) <br />19ore 1. Penods of motion and rest for monitored k <br />roc s. <br />Travel distances were measured twice tl <br />,he moniloring period crable 2) Th arrock 12 and ~ for rock 17 during <br />10 " '. The average ",,"spun v~loci e a~erage ",,"sport velOClnes were 0,36 and 0.50 <br />."'on episodes and 0 5110 s-1 for Iy 0 rock!2 was 0.25 10 s-I after the fll'St three <br />kknlical to lhat of rock 17, where ~ ~:fu!'I~ (Fig" I), The lalle~ value is nearly <br />l:'Jl1sodc. The b'anSport velocities nl()(t()n penods occtuTed m one motion <br />measured by Schmid. and Ergen';;~~) Phe: Oeek are ~parable to those <br />\-c1ncilies of 0.50 m 5-1 Th .' w reponed maxunum transpon <br />_imum average wa~ vel~:=';:':d"Y of26~,50fm s-I was 18% of the <br />\'c1ocuy. or -/0 0 the average cross-sectional <br /> <br />'n Ihis slOOy, only mean ste length <br />''''<I distances, the rocks had.Jill s were measured crable 2), For similar <br />.'"mes the grain diamerer c~ % mean step Ieng!hs of 5,9 and 7,8 Ill, or 77 and <br />by hostein (1950). Howe~er in a~O- e ~a1ue ,!f 100 IIlIlCS the grain diameter asSUmed <br />Ilcp' for a mean step length of 84,3 10 IUJ~ pen~ rock 12l1'!'veJ.ed 253 10 in three <br />In. mean step length of 13,7 10 or 181d II~ tuneS.the.gnnn diameter, Thisresulted <br />'ho", "'JlOl1ed by Schmidt and Ergenzin;;:(I99!J:'" diameter, values similar to <br />The distribution of the d ti ' <br />f/t,juc:ncy of shon duration resrura "." of ~t penods is '!ig~y skewed with a high <br />In upooential function (Einste:,mo:s (yFtg, 2). The distribunon can he described by <br />, ,angandSayre, 1971), ThePheIanCreei< <br /> <br />~ <br />