Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING '94 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />750 <br /> <br />flow, and were designed to model the prototype's minimum Frauds number, <br />slope. and velocity at the flood peak. This was accomplished using 8 model <br />scale of 1 :32.1 based on Froudian criteria. Sediment was introduced into the <br />flume by a constant feed sediment hopper. Water depths in the flume were <br />measured in stilling wells. The flow exited the flume in free flow. <br /> <br />Rouahness Coefficients. The increase in the Manning's roughness <br />coefficient due to bed load transport was determined by the slope-area method, <br />using the known discharge. friction slope, and the hydraulic properties of the <br />flume. The Manning's n.value of the flume was determined to be about 0.009 <br />based on clear-water flows. <br /> <br />Flume Results. The tests were conducted using two uniform grain sizes <br />and a gradation that simulates the gravel portion of the creek bed. The uniform <br />grain sizes simulate the prototype dS4 (76 ~ 153 mm, mean size 108 mm, C1 = <br />1.4) and the large boulders found in the armor layer upstream from the <br />proposed project, d_, (153,305 mm, mean size 216 mm, 0; 1,41, Tho <br />concentrations ranged up to 5000 ppm, which was considered sufficiently high <br />to simulate the gravel bed load in Mission Creek. Actual prototype gravel <br />concentrations were determined by the numerical model study. <br /> <br />Results from the flume tests are shown in Figure 1. Tests for the dmu <br />material were conducted with concentrations varying from 200 to 5000 ppm, <br />The gravel bed material was observed to move down the flume in bouncing or <br />rolling motions at velocities slightly less than the water. Between 200 and 800 <br />ppm, there was a minor increase in roughness from 1.4 to 5.7 percent. <br />Between 1600 and 3000 ppm, the Manning's roughness coefficient increased <br />from 8.6 to about 16.4 percent. And at 3250 ppm, the flume tests indicated <br />that the flow regime becomes unstable and bed forms began to develop. <br /> <br />Tests for the dS4 material were conducted with concentrations varying <br />from 200 to 3000 ppm, Similar to the d_ tests, the gravel bed material <br />moved down the flume in bouncing or rolling motions at velocities slightly less <br />than the water. Between 200 and 800 ppm, there was a minor increase m <br />roughness from 1.4 to 6.4 percent, Between 1600 and 3000 ppm, tho <br />Manning's roughness coefficient increased from 8.6 to about 16.4 percent. For <br />the dS4 material. the flow regime became unstable at about 3000 ppm. <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />Tests for the bed material gradation were conducted with concentrations <br />varying from 500 to 3000 ppm, Between 200 and 1500 ppm, there was a <br />minor increase in roughness from 2.1 to 7.9 percent. Between 2000 and 3000 <br />ppm, the Manning's roughness coefficient increased from 12.1 to about 14.3 <br />percent. A maximum threshold concentration for the bed material gradation <br />was not determined. <br /> <br />Review of the flume data reveals two points: 1) the results are not very <br />sensitive to the grain size for the hydrauliC conditions and grain sizes modelled; <br />and 2) the flow regime would be supercritical for the anticipated range of gravel <br />concentrations. <br /> <br />..,< "', ,.,. <br /> <br />BED LOAD ROUGHNESS <br /> <br />. <br />751 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I; <br /> <br /> <br />0.0175 <br /> <br />0.0\70 <br /> <br />" <br />& 0.0165 <br />. <br />.. <br />> <br />'00,0160 <br />~ <br />.. <br /> <br />'ii 0.0155 <br />.. 0.0153 <br />, <br />.. <br />> <br />I 0.0150 <br />c <br /> <br />-€I- <br />.. .... ............ Dmall <br />-+- <br />0.. <br />. ..... . ..-....................... ---- <br />0.."" <br /> <br />0.0145 <br /> <br />0.0140 <br />o 500 <br /> <br />1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 <br />Grovel Concentration (ppm) <br /> <br />3500 <br /> <br />Figure 1. Effect of bed load transport on hydraulic roughness <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />Pre~icted bed load transport rates from the numerical model have been <br />couple~ With measured hydraulic roughnesses from the flume study to <br />determine the effect of the gravel, cobble and boulder load for the proposed <br />MISSIon Cree~ channel, Based on the numerical modeling completed by the Los <br />Angeles District, the m~ximum concentration of large-sized material inflowing <br />:he proposed co~cr~te~hnBd channel would be about 1300 ppm. Results from <br />he ~lume study I~dlcate that this maximum concentration would increase the <br />maXimum hydraulic roughness of the bed from 0,014 to 0,01 53, Additionally <br />res~lts from. ~he flume study reveal that bed forms would not form unde; <br />prolect conditions for concentrations up to 3000 ppm. <br /> <br />Appendix I. References <br /> <br />us . Army Eng.ineer District. Los Angeles. 1986. ItFeasibility report and <br /> <br />aCnvlronmentallmpact statement. Lower Mission Creek interim Santa Barbara <br />ounty streams, California. It ' <br /> <br />v ' <br />anon!, . V.A. (1964), ItTransport of suspended sediment by water." <br />Transactions, ASCE, paper 2267, 1 1 1: 129, 160, <br /> <br />........ <br />