Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />148 <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING '94 <br /> <br />Flume and numerical model investigations have been conducted to <br />evaluate the effect of bed load transport on hydraulic roughness. and the <br />characteristics of the bed load transport itself. The flume study was conducted <br />at the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES). In conjunction <br />with the flume study, a numerical sedimentation model study was conducted <br />by the US Army Engineer District. Los Angeles, <br /> <br />Description of the Study Area <br /> <br />The Mission Creek watershed comprises about 29.8 square kilometers <br />and is located in a narrow coastal area which extends from the Santa Ynez <br />mountains on the north to the Pacific Ocean on the South. Mission Creek rises <br />about 1140 meters in elevation and flows about 13 kilometers to empty into <br />the Pacific Ocean. In the headwater areas. stream gradients are as steep as <br />492 meters per kilometer and average 189 meters per kilometer. In the lower <br />reaches. on the alluvial plain below the foothills. everage slopes are about 28 <br />meters per kilometer. <br /> <br />Gredetion Analysis <br /> <br />Sediment samples were collected along the creek and a gradation <br />analysis was performed to determine the grain size distribution and the <br />maximum particle size. Along the channel, a backhoe was utilized to collect the <br />sediment samples since the bed material consisted primarily of boulders and <br />cobbles. The maximum grain size of the bed material collected was about 305 <br />mm with an average d50 of about 50 Mm. <br /> <br />Inflowlng Load <br /> <br />General ADDroach. The amount of sediment inflowing to the proposed <br />channel wes estimated by routing e 1 OO-year balanced hydrogreph through the <br />natural channel upstream of the project reach. The sediment routing was <br />performed with e special version of TABS-l (i,e, HEC-61. a one-dimensional <br />numerical model developed at WES. which ellows for transport of individual <br />grain sizes larger than 64 mm along with sand and gravel sizes. Equilibrium <br />transport was assumed at the upstream boundary of a 2.9-kilometer study <br />reach. <br /> <br />In this analysis, it was expected that the bed load material will consist <br />primarily of gravel. cobbles. and boulders, Sand and silt sized material should <br />be carried as suspended~load given the high velocities of the relatively steep <br />stream system. <br /> <br />Sensitivity Analysis. A sensitivity analysis was conducted since <br />prototype data did not exist for model adjustment. The sensitivity analysis <br />consisted of testing various sediment transport functions and then varying the <br />inflowing sediment load for each function. The transport functions included <br />Yang's unit stream power, a combination of the Toffaleti and Schoklitsch <br />functions. a combination of the Toffaleti and Meyer~Peter and Muller functions, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BED LOAD ROUGHNESS <br /> <br />149 <br /> <br />and the Meyer-Peter and MOiler function by itself. The inflowing sediment load <br />ratio was halved and doubled at the upstream end of the numerical model <br />during the simulations as an additional sensitivity test. <br /> <br />~. Results for the sediment routing for the peak discharge are <br />shown in Table 1 and indicate that the concentrations flowing into the concrete <br />channel may vary between 1450 and 17.900 ppm for the total load, in which <br />the gravel. cobble and boulder concentrations vary from 61 to 1030 ppm. <br />These results are for an inflow sediment load ratio of 1.0. Additionally. it <br />appears that the combination of the Toffa1eti and Meyer-Peter and Maller <br />transport functions gives the highest bed load concentration. <br /> <br />Purpose of the Flume Study <br /> <br />As eerly as 1946. Vanoni (19461 demonstrated thatsuspended sand. et <br />concentrations between 1200 and 3300 ppm, caused a reduction of up to 10 <br />percent in effectiye bed roughness over a flat bed. It has also been <br />demonstrated by many investigators that both sand and gravel bed forms <br />moving along the bottom of a flume or river at a velocity much slower than the <br />flow can significantly increase effective roughness. It was anticipated that flow <br />energy in Mission Creek would be sufficient to prevent the establishment of bed <br />forms at expected rates of bed-load transport. However. it was expected that <br />bad load moving along the bed of the channel at a velocity slightly less than the <br />velocity of the water would introduce some drag and would therefore tend to <br />increase the effective hydraulic roughness. The purpose of the flume study <br />was to quantify this increase and to determine at what concentration bed forms <br />begin to appear. <br /> <br />Flume Studies <br /> <br />The tilting steel flume used in this study was about 24,4 meters long <br />and 0.9 meters wide. The flume tests were conducted using steady uniform <br /> <br />Table 1, Totel and gravel concentretions at peak discharge <br />for different transport functions <br /> <br />Transport Total Total Gravel Gravel <br />Function Load Concentration load. Concentration. <br /> (t/dl (ppml (lIdl (ppml <br />Yang 323.700 17.900 1100 61 <br />Toff-Schoklitsch 248.800 13.800 10,500 580 <br />Toff,MPM 160.600 8880 18.600 1030 <br />MPM 26.300 1450 17.200 950 <br />. Includes graver. cobb es. and boulders <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />